Fantastic! I'm glad to hear it.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 1:39 AM Andre Naujoks wrote:
>
> On 9/10/18 10:36 AM, Andre Naujoks wrote:
> > On 9/8/18 11:49 AM, Andre Naujoks wrote:
> >> On 9/7/18 6:08 PM, David Lloyd wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 6:56 AM Andre Naujoks wrote:
> On 9/7/18 1:
On 9/10/18 10:36 AM, Andre Naujoks wrote:
> On 9/8/18 11:49 AM, Andre Naujoks wrote:
>> On 9/7/18 6:08 PM, David Lloyd wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 6:56 AM Andre Naujoks wrote:
On 9/7/18 1:15 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 07/09/2018 10:49, Decke, Hendrik (K-GERFA/A) wrote:
>>
Vyom,
On 12/09/18 10:09, vyom tewari wrote:
Hi Alan,Chris,
I imported the Andre's patch and our all existing internal tests are clean.
Ok, great. This is as expected.
Next step would be to create a few tests to verify the
change. Maybe look as some existing tests that use join,
and refactor
On 12/09/2018 10:09, vyom tewari wrote:
Hi Alan,Chris,
I imported the Andre's patch and our all existing internal tests are
clean.
Good to hear!
Next step will be to add or extend existing tests to cover binding to
both IPv4 and IPv6 multicast addresses. The Promiscuous tests (one for
Mu
Hi Alan,Chris,
I imported the Andre's patch and our all existing internal tests are clean.
Thanks,
Vyom
On Monday 10 September 2018 10:58 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 10/09/18 15:35, Chris Hegarty wrote:
...
Maybe the native implementation of these methods can be
updated to accept a scope,
On 10/09/18 15:35, Chris Hegarty wrote:
...
Maybe the native implementation of these methods can be
updated to accept a scope, rather than poking around in
the InetSocketAddress from JNI code.
Rolling back on this comment. I overlooked the fact that
the additional checks are multicast-specif
On 10/09/18 15:09, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 10/09/2018 14:53, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 10/09/18 10:22, vyom tewari wrote:
...
Hi Andre,
i will apply your patch run our all network tests. I will update once
i will have result.
The patch in question is in the description of
https://bugs.open
On 10/09/2018 14:53, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 10/09/18 10:22, vyom tewari wrote:
...
Hi Andre,
i will apply your patch run our all network tests. I will update once
i will have result.
The patch in question is in the description of
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210493, correct?
On 10/09/18 10:22, vyom tewari wrote:
...
Hi Andre,
i will apply your patch run our all network tests. I will update once i
will have result.
The patch in question is in the description of
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210493, correct?
I'm posting it in this thread for referen
On Monday 10 September 2018 12:28 PM, Andre Naujoks wrote:
On 9/9/18 9:16 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 07/09/2018 13:22, Andre Naujoks wrote:
:
I have not tried joining IPv4 groups on an IPv6 socket through java,
since we do not use IPv4 at all in this particular environment. I have
tried sett
On 9/8/18 11:49 AM, Andre Naujoks wrote:
> On 9/7/18 6:08 PM, David Lloyd wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 6:56 AM Andre Naujoks wrote:
>>> On 9/7/18 1:15 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 07/09/2018 10:49, Decke, Hendrik (K-GERFA/A) wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> it seems one of our external
On 9/9/18 9:16 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 07/09/2018 13:22, Andre Naujoks wrote:
>> :
>> I have not tried joining IPv4 groups on an IPv6 socket through java,
>> since we do not use IPv4 at all in this particular environment. I have
>> tried setting IP_MULTICAST_ALL to 0 in the IPv6 scenario (in a
On 07/09/2018 13:22, Andre Naujoks wrote:
:
I have not tried joining IPv4 groups on an IPv6 socket through java,
since we do not use IPv4 at all in this particular environment. I have
tried setting IP_MULTICAST_ALL to 0 in the IPv6 scenario (in a C++
project), hoping it would help, but it did not
On 9/7/18 6:08 PM, David Lloyd wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 6:56 AM Andre Naujoks wrote:
>> On 9/7/18 1:15 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> On 07/09/2018 10:49, Decke, Hendrik (K-GERFA/A) wrote:
Hello,
it seems one of our external developers (Andre Naujoks, CC) found a
bug w
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 11:08 AM David Lloyd wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 6:56 AM Andre Naujoks wrote:
> > On 9/7/18 1:15 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> > > On 07/09/2018 10:49, Decke, Hendrik (K-GERFA/A) wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> it seems one of our external developers (Andre Naujok
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 6:56 AM Andre Naujoks wrote:
> On 9/7/18 1:15 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> > On 07/09/2018 10:49, Decke, Hendrik (K-GERFA/A) wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> it seems one of our external developers (Andre Naujoks, CC) found a
> >> bug while binding a IPv6 multicast UDP-socket
On 9/7/18 1:57 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 07/09/2018 12:33, Andre Naujoks wrote:
>> :
>> Hi Alan.
>>
>> First of all, thank you for the quick reply. I was not aware, that there
>> was actually a bug opened for that issue.
>>
>> The join is not the problem at this point. We need to bind the socket
On 07/09/2018 12:33, Andre Naujoks wrote:
:
Hi Alan.
First of all, thank you for the quick reply. I was not aware, that there
was actually a bug opened for that issue.
The join is not the problem at this point. We need to bind the socket to
the address to avoid receiving traffic from all multic
On 9/7/18 1:15 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 07/09/2018 10:49, Decke, Hendrik (K-GERFA/A) wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> it seems one of our external developers (Andre Naujoks, CC) found a
>> bug while binding a IPv6 multicast UDP-socket for one of our projects.
>>
>>
>>
>> Since this seems to be a fun
On 07/09/2018 10:49, Decke, Hendrik (K-GERFA/A) wrote:
Hello,
it seems one of our external developers (Andre Naujoks, CC) found a
bug while binding a IPv6 multicast UDP-socket for one of our projects.
Since this seems to be a fundamental bug (from our perspective), we
address this directly
Hello,
it seems one of our external developers (Andre Naujoks, CC) found a bug while
binding a IPv6 multicast UDP-socket for one of our projects.
Since this seems to be a fundamental bug (from our perspective), we address
this directly to this mailing list.
(reproducible in OpenJDK 8-11, Windows
21 matches
Mail list logo
