On 10/08/12 17:28, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 10/08/2012 17:10, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Christian,
I finally got back to this.
Since init() is only ever called from the class initializer it is
implicitly single threaded, so we only need to add the synchronized
keyword to getSystemProxy().
I also
On 02/08/12 16:47, Andrew Hughes wrote:
- Original Message -
Thanks for the cross post David. Yes, net-dev is the best place to
discuss this issue ( bcc'ing off jdk7u-dev ).
Thanks for reporting this issue Christian. I haven't looked at the
proposed patch yet, but I agree we may want
Hi Christian,
Probably best to discuss this on the net-dev@openjdk.java.net list (cc'd).
Two comments from me (I'm not on net-dev):
1. CHECK_NULL does a return so you will be leaving the monitor locked if
you encounter any nulls.
2. Is it simpler to add synchronization at the Java level? (I
- Original Message -
Thanks for the cross post David. Yes, net-dev is the best place to
discuss this issue ( bcc'ing off jdk7u-dev ).
Thanks for reporting this issue Christian. I haven't looked at the
proposed patch yet, but I agree we may want to simplify this if
possible
(
Am 08/02/12 17:27, schrieb Chris Hegarty:
Thanks for the cross post David. Yes, net-dev is the best place to
discuss this issue ( bcc'ing off jdk7u-dev ).
Thanks for reporting this issue Christian. I haven't looked at the
proposed patch yet, but I agree we may want to simplify this if possible
