Re: RFR: 8274453: (sctp) com/sun/nio/sctp/SctpChannel/CloseDescriptors.java test should be resilient to lsof warnings

2021-09-29 Thread Aleksey Shipilev
On Tue, 28 Sep 2021 15:54:09 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: > Recently added test fails on my desktop in the course of newly added `tier4` > runs. The reason is simple: the test verifies that lsof outputs no more than > LIMIT_LINES (2) lines. And on my machine, lsof prints some warnings that

Re: RFR: 8274453: (sctp) com/sun/nio/sctp/SctpChannel/CloseDescriptors.java test should be resilient to lsof warnings

2021-09-29 Thread Alan Bateman
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 15:05:21 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: > Ok, thanks. @AlanBateman, want to ack? I don't have anything to add except to say that close and async close implementations in the SCTP classes needs to be re-written and brought into line with the implementation in NIO. Also I'm

Re: RFR: 8274453: (sctp) com/sun/nio/sctp/SctpChannel/CloseDescriptors.java test should be resilient to lsof warnings

2021-09-29 Thread Aleksey Shipilev
On Tue, 28 Sep 2021 15:54:09 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: > Recently added test fails on my desktop in the course of newly added `tier4` > runs. The reason is simple: the test verifies that lsof outputs no more than > LIMIT_LINES (2) lines. And on my machine, lsof prints some warnings that

Re: RFR: 8274453: (sctp) com/sun/nio/sctp/SctpChannel/CloseDescriptors.java test should be resilient to lsof warnings

2021-09-29 Thread Daniel Fuchs
On Tue, 28 Sep 2021 15:54:09 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: > Recently added test fails on my desktop in the course of newly added `tier4` > runs. The reason is simple: the test verifies that lsof outputs no more than > LIMIT_LINES (2) lines. And on my machine, lsof prints some warnings that

Re: RFR: 8274453: (sctp) com/sun/nio/sctp/SctpChannel/CloseDescriptors.java test should be resilient to lsof warnings

2021-09-28 Thread Daniel Fuchs
On Tue, 28 Sep 2021 15:54:09 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: > Recently added test fails on my desktop in the course of newly added `tier4` > runs. The reason is simple: the test verifies that lsof outputs no more than > LIMIT_LINES (2) lines. And on my machine, lsof prints some warnings that