On 16/06/2016 16:38, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 16 Jun 2016, at 16:31, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 16/06/2016 16:03, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Some platforms do not support multicasting, but the current spec requires that
it is supported. It seems reasonable to relax this, somewhat, so that
multicastin
> On 16 Jun 2016, at 16:31, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
> On 16/06/2016 16:03, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
>> Some platforms do not support multicasting, but the current spec requires
>> that
>> it is supported. It seems reasonable to relax this, somewhat, so that
>> multicasting
>> is effectively optio
On 16/06/2016 16:03, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Some platforms do not support multicasting, but the current spec requires that
it is supported. It seems reasonable to relax this, somewhat, so that
multicasting
is effectively optional on these platforms.
java.net.MulticastSocket.joinGroup and java.ni
Some platforms do not support multicasting, but the current spec requires that
it is supported. It seems reasonable to relax this, somewhat, so that
multicasting
is effectively optional on these platforms.
java.net.MulticastSocket.joinGroup and java.nio.channels.MulticastChannel.join
method spec
