[OFFLIST] Re: RFR 8016521: InetAddress should not always re-order addresses returned from name service

2016-05-17 Thread Chris Hegarty
t;> actually make the system based address detection unuseable in v6 >>>>>>> scenarios. >>>>>> I agree. Specifically you talking about Inet6AddressImpl >>>>>> anyLocalAddress() and loopbackAddress(), right? >>>>>> I think

Re: RFR 8016521: InetAddress should not always re-order addresses returned from name service

2016-05-17 Thread Chris Hegarty
use ipv6 (as of rfc). Returning 127.0.1/0.0.0.0 might >>>>>>> actually make the system based address detection unuseable in v6 >>>>>>> scenarios. >>>>>> I agree. Specifically you talking about Inet6AddressImpl >>>>>> anyLocalAddress() and

Re: RFR 8016521: InetAddress should not always re-order addresses returned from name service

2016-05-17 Thread vyom
t-dev Sent: Di., 10 Mai 2016 12:36 Subject: RFR 8016521: InetAddress should not always re-order addresses returned from name service Hi All, Please review the code changes for the below issue. Bug : JDK-8016521 : InetAddress should not always re-order addresses returned from name service W

Re: RFR 8016521: InetAddress should not always re-order addresses returned from name service

2016-05-17 Thread Chris Hegarty
REFER_SYSTEM_VALUE) >>>> >>>> InetAddressImplFactory already checks for ‘isIPv6Supported’ when >>>> determining which impl to create. If an Inet6AddressImpl is created, >>>> then IPv6 is supported on the system, therefore either >>>> PRE

Re: RFR 8016521: InetAddress should not always re-order addresses returned from name service

2016-05-17 Thread vyom
space, ‘if(…)’ L 445 -Chris. Gruss Bernd -- http://bernd.eckenfels.net -Original Message- From: vyom To: net-dev Sent: Di., 10 Mai 2016 12:36 Subject: RFR 8016521: InetAddress should not always re-order addresses returned from name service Hi All, Please review the code changes for the

Re: RFR 8016521: InetAddress should not always re-order addresses returned from name service

2016-05-13 Thread Chris Hegarty
lues unix Inet6AddressImpl.c. missing space, ‘if(…)’ L 445 -Chris. Gruss Bernd -- http://bernd.eckenfels.net -Original Message- From: vyom To: net-dev Sent: Di., 10 Mai 2016 12:36 Subject: RFR 8016521: InetAddress should not always re-order addresses returned from name service Hi All,

Re: RFR 8016521: InetAddress should not always re-order addresses returned from name service

2016-05-13 Thread vyom
e, ‘if(…)’ L 445 -Chris. Gruss Bernd -- http://bernd.eckenfels.net -Original Message- From: vyom To: net-dev Sent: Di., 10 Mai 2016 12:36 Subject: RFR 8016521: InetAddress should not always re-order addresses returned from name service Hi All, Please review the code changes for the b

Re: RFR 8016521: InetAddress should not always re-order addresses returned from name service

2016-05-12 Thread Chris Hegarty
the int values unix Inet6AddressImpl.c. missing space, ‘if(…)’ L 445 -Chris. > Gruss > Bernd > -- > http://bernd.eckenfels.net > > -Original Message- > From: vyom > To: net-dev > Sent: Di., 10 Mai 2016 12:36 > Subject: RFR 8016521: InetAddress should n

Re: RFR 8016521: InetAddress should not always re-order addresses returned from name service

2016-05-10 Thread ecki
Subject: RFR 8016521: InetAddress should not always re-order addresses returned from name service Hi All, Please review the code changes for the below issue. Bug : JDK-8016521 : InetAddress should not always re-order addresses returned from name service Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net

RFR 8016521: InetAddress should not always re-order addresses returned from name service

2016-05-10 Thread vyom
Hi All, Please review the code changes for the below issue. Bug : JDK-8016521 : InetAddress should not always re-order addresses returned from name service Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vtewari/8016521/webrev0.0/index.html