inconvenience.
John
- Original Message -
From: dmitry.samers...@oracle.com
To: john.zavg...@oracle.com
Cc: net-dev@openjdk.java.net
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 11:54:58 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: RFR8003991 (take two)
John,
I guess free(loRoutes) should be here.
-Dmitry
On 20
On 11/27/2012 09:42 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 26/11/2012 23:19, John Zavgren wrote:
Greetings:
I'm posting the webrev image of a change that I made that eliminates a
potential file descriptor leak. (The previous RFR referenced a webrev
image with the right file name but the wrong content. 'sor
On 26/11/2012 23:19, John Zavgren wrote:
Greetings:
I'm posting the webrev image of a change that I made that eliminates a
potential file descriptor leak. (The previous RFR referenced a webrev image
with the right file name but the wrong content. 'sorry about that.)
http://cr.openjdk.java.net
John,
I guess free(loRoutes) should be here.
-Dmitry
On 2012-11-27 03:19, John Zavgren wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> I'm posting the webrev image of a change that I made that eliminates a
> potential file descriptor leak. (The previous RFR referenced a webrev image
> with the right file name but t
Aren't we effectively calling fclose(NULL) here now?
- Kurchi
On 26.11.2012 15:19, John Zavgren wrote:
Greetings:
I'm posting the webrev image of a change that I made that eliminates a
potential file descriptor leak. (The previous RFR referenced a webrev image
with the right file name but th
Greetings:
I'm posting the webrev image of a change that I made that eliminates a
potential file descriptor leak. (The previous RFR referenced a webrev image
with the right file name but the wrong content. 'sorry about that.)
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mullan/webrevs/8003991/webrev.00/
Thanks
