Thanks Jonathan.
On 12/11/2012 10:44 AM, Jonathan Lu wrote:
Hi Frank,
Patch pushed @ http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/883feced1cdd
Best regards!
- Jonathan
On 12/11/2012 09:49 AM, Frank Ding wrote:
Hi All,
Thank you all. I will have Jonathan help to commit.
Best regards,
Frank
Hi Frank,
Patch pushed @ http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/883feced1cdd
Best regards!
- Jonathan
On 12/11/2012 09:49 AM, Frank Ding wrote:
Hi All,
Thank you all. I will have Jonathan help to commit.
Best regards,
Frank
On 12/10/2012 6:12 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 10/12/2012 08
Hi All,
Thank you all. I will have Jonathan help to commit.
Best regards,
Frank
On 12/10/2012 6:12 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 10/12/2012 08:01, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Frank,
Excellent! Thank you for doing it.
Ditto, thanks Frank.
I assume Sean or Neil will push this for you? Otherwise
On 10/12/2012 08:01, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Frank,
Excellent! Thank you for doing it.
Ditto, thanks Frank.
I assume Sean or Neil will push this for you? Otherwise, just let me
know and I can do it.
-Chris.
-Dmitry
On 2012-12-10 12:00, Frank Ding wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
I updated wording
Hi Dmitry,
I updated wording accordingly @
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dingxmin/6512101/webrev.03. It is now
changed to "Cannot get multibyte char for interface display name". What
about that?
Best regards,
Frank
On 12/10/2012 3:43 PM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Frank,
Looks good for me.
Frank,
Excellent! Thank you for doing it.
-Dmitry
On 2012-12-10 12:00, Frank Ding wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
> I updated wording accordingly @
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dingxmin/6512101/webrev.03. It is now
> changed to "Cannot get multibyte char for interface display name". What
> about that?
Hi Dmitry and Chris,
Could you please review the second revision again?
Thanks and Best regards,
Frank
On 11/29/2012 1:08 PM, Frank Ding wrote:
Hi Dmitry and Chris,
Thanks for your comments. With your comments incorporated, I've
prepared v2 @
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dingxmin/6512101/
Frank,
Looks good for me.
May be "Can't get WIDE string" should be changed to something more verbose.
-Dmitry
On 2012-12-10 11:40, Frank Ding wrote:
> Hi Dmitry and Chris,
> Could you please review the second revision again?
>
> Thanks and Best regards,
> Frank
> On 11/29/2012 1:08 PM, Fran
Hi Dmitry and Chris,
Thanks for your comments. With your comments incorporated, I've
prepared v2 @ http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dingxmin/6512101/webrev.02/.
Could you please review it again?
Best regards,
Frank
On 11/14/2012 12:12 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 11/11/2012 07:03 PM, Dmitry S
On 11/11/2012 07:03 PM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Frank,
Changes look good for me.
I admit that I am not an expert in this area, but given the information
you provided, and I guess you verified this in your environment, the
conversion would appear reasonable.
But it might be better to fall
Frank,
Changes look good for me.
But it might be better to fall back to original behavior if
MultiByteToWideChar return error, rather than abort.
-Dmitry
On 2012-11-07 13:08, Frank Ding wrote:
> Hi guys,
> Could you please take a look at patch below aimed to resolve existing
> bug http://bugs
Frank,
I'll need some time to study this change.
-Chris.
On 07/11/2012 09:08, Frank Ding wrote:
Hi guys,
Could you please take a look at patch below aimed to resolve existing
bug http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6512101 ?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dingxmin/6512101/webrev.01
Hi guys,
Could you please take a look at patch below aimed to resolve existing
bug http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6512101 ?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dingxmin/6512101/webrev.01/
I happen to have a Chinese Win 7 environment. "buggy.png" is current
output of test cas
13 matches
Mail list logo
