hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 7098719: -Dsun.net.maxDatagramSockets and Socket constructor does not work correctly with System.gc()

2011-10-10 Thread chris . hegarty
Changeset: 1e89a13d9d8f Author:chegar Date: 2011-10-10 10:38 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/1e89a13d9d8f 7098719: -Dsun.net.maxDatagramSockets and Socket constructor does not work correctly with System.gc() Reviewed-by: michaelm !

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 7098755: test/sun/misc/JarIndex/metaInfFilenames/Basic.java should use supported compiler interface

2011-10-10 Thread chris . hegarty
Changeset: 2a36b8741363 Author:chegar Date: 2011-10-10 15:29 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/2a36b8741363 7098755: test/sun/misc/JarIndex/metaInfFilenames/Basic.java should use supported compiler interface Reviewed-by: mcimadamore !

Re: ntlm with ms exchange server not working since java 1.7

2011-10-10 Thread Chris Hegarty
Max [to'ed], Does this look familiar? Is it wrong for the server to be returning WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate during NTLM handshake? -Chris. On 08/10/2011 14:41, Mario Ivankovits wrote: Hi net-devs, I hope you do not mind that I post to this list, but I hope I can provide enough in-depth

Re: ntlm with ms exchange server not working since java 1.7

2011-10-10 Thread Weijun Wang
During an NTLM handshake, I've never seen a server mentioning another scheme. As seen in message #4, the NTLM header still contains data, so there should not be WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate header. That said, this is only my experience. I tried to find any words on this from an RFC but failed.

AW: ntlm with ms exchange server not working since java 1.7

2011-10-10 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! I too did a lot of research on the internet regarding this http header field ... and didn't find something which defines a correct behavior for the server during the negotiation phase. The two phases the NTLM requires is a Microsoft extension, covered in many details, but not able to

Re: AW: ntlm with ms exchange server not working since java 1.7

2011-10-10 Thread Weijun Wang
On 10/10/2011 11:35 AM, Mario Ivankovits wrote: Hi! I too did a lot of research on the internet regarding this http header field ... and didn't find something which defines a correct behavior for the server during the negotiation phase. The two phases the NTLM requires is a Microsoft

Re: AW: ntlm with ms exchange server not working since java 1.7

2011-10-10 Thread Weijun Wang
On 10/10/2011 12:45 PM, Mario Ivankovits wrote: Hi! back again ;-) To my surprise Digest will be chosen first (this is documented in sun.net.www.protocol.http.AuthenticationHeader, but wrong I think, shouldn't it be read like this: negotiate - kerberos - ntlm - digest - basic) -