Max [to'ed],
Does this look familiar? Is it wrong for the server to be returning
WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate during NTLM handshake?
-Chris.
On 08/10/2011 14:41, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi net-devs,
I hope you do not mind that I post to this list, but I hope I can
provide enough in-depth
During an NTLM handshake, I've never seen a server mentioning another scheme.
As seen in message #4, the NTLM header still contains data, so there should not
be WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate header.
That said, this is only my experience. I tried to find any words on this from
an RFC but failed.
with ms exchange server not working since java 1.7
During an NTLM handshake, I've never seen a server mentioning another scheme.
As seen in message #4, the NTLM header still contains data, so there should not
be WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate header.
That said, this is only my experience. I tried
Nachricht-
Von: Weijun Wang [mailto:weijun.w...@oracle.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 10. Oktober 2011 17:33
An: Chris Hegarty
Cc: Mario Ivankovits; net-dev@openjdk.java.net
Betreff: Re: ntlm with ms exchange server not working since java 1.7
During an NTLM handshake, I've never seen a server mentioning
:33
An: Chris Hegarty
Cc: Mario Ivankovits; net-dev@openjdk.java.net
Betreff: Re: ntlm with ms exchange server not working since java 1.7
During an NTLM handshake, I've never seen a server mentioning another scheme.
As seen in message #4, the NTLM header still contains data, so there should
Hi net-devs,
I hope you do not mind that I post to this list, but I hope I can provide
enough in-depth information about the problem to justify the post here.
Accessing a normal ntlm protected resource - a simple index.html in an
protected directory on an IIS 7.5 server - the ntlm
