On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 10:56:43 -0700 Fong wrote:
FT> Is it a known issue there is a problem to launch Ipv6 and ipv4 together?
It works in the main line CVS, so I'd guess it should work in 5.1.2 as well.
FT> It seems it only gets the first type of trapsport. I am using 5.0.9.
FT> Any help is appreci
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 16:51:44 +0530 Nagaich, wrote:
NN> Hi All,
NN>is there any way of disabling logging completely for a sub-agent. I am
NN> unsing net-snmp 5.1.1
NN>
NN> I disabled stderr explicitly but subagent automatically enables stderr
NN> and
NN> prints debug messages on console.
At
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:28:01 -0700 Fong wrote:
FT> Do you remember the patch number for or AgentX set memory leaks?
Take your pick:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=12694&atid=112694&func=detail&aid=785586
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=12694&atid=112694&func=detail&aid=702435
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 22:42:04 +0100 Richard wrote:
RM> I'm using net-snmp on debian testing version 5.1.1-2 and have run into
RM> the problem referenced below where 64 bit interface counters don't get
RM> handled properly.
RM>
RM> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=7090918
[whic
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 17:41:46 +0700 Duy wrote:
DAN> I'm trying to use the net-snmp package, version 5.1.1. [...]
DAN>
DAN> Hence, I debug to find the problem. Everything went smooth, until I
DAN> reach the function route_write.c : write_rte().
DAN> [...]
DAN> Corresponding to above command, this
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:54:00 +0900 Won-Sik wrote:
WSK> If somebody who know about definition MIB_CLIENTS_ARE_EVIL, let me know.
A quick grep of the code turns up an explanation in snmp_vars.c:
* mib clients are passed a pointer to a oid buffer. Some mib clients
* * (namely, those first noticed
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:40:08 -0700 (PDT) Rahul wrote:
RK> I am new to net-snmp and wanted a jumpstart to write a
RK> multithreaded subagent that provides GET operation on
RK> scalars. The variables managed by the agent will be
RK> stored in memory and need to be updated by another
RK> thread period
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:50:43 +0200 Tommy wrote:
TC> May I suggest you try this patch instead:
TC>http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=5198108
TC>
TC> I successfully run the agent with that one applied.
Hi Tommy,
Thanks for the patch! It has been applied to all 5.x branches.
Hello listmates,
Patch #991664 (installheaders fix and lazy evaluation)
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=991664&group_id=12694&atid=312694
breaks SCO Unixware and any other systems where the "test" command does
not support the "-nt" (newer than) operator. This was added t
Title: RE: Get data using Tcp6
Correction:
It is
snmpwalk -c public tcp6:[fe80::2e0:81ff:fe25:8097]:161
ucdavis --- Unknown host (Invalid argument)
-Original Message- From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Fong Tsui
Sent: Mon 8/16/2004 2:10 PM To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Mi
Do you remember the patch number for or AgentX set memory leaks?
Thanks,
Fong
-Original Message-
From: Robert Story (Coders) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 3:27 PM
To: Fong Tsui
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug 919537 (916605) - memory leak
On Thu, 5 Au
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 18:09:57 -0700 Fong wrote:
FT> I downloaded net-snmp-5.1.2.rc2 and checked out ChangeLog. Does each change
FT> have a patch associated with it? How can I get particular fix?
No, there is not a patch associated with every change. But, as Dave indicated,
you can see the diff in c
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 19:57:57 +0200 Magnus wrote:
MF> #1 Make install fails since man/Makefile.in still refers to netsnmp_todo.3
MF> and
MF>netsnmp_deprecated.3
This has been fixed in the past week.
MF> # Building the perl module and simple examples fails since
MF> include/net-snmp/agent/mfd.
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 17:40:08 -0700 Steve wrote:
SF> I've just submitted a patch to deal with a portability issue [...]
SF>
SF> The short description is that the code now doesn't deal well with the
SF> tm.tm_gmtoff struct member [...]
Hi Steve,
It looks like Dave checked in your patch (or a versio
> What openssl should I be using?
In general, latest 0.9.7-stable snapshot is preferred over released 0.9.7d
which has nasty bugs. Those known bugs fortunately don't affect Net-SNMP,
though.
So what needs to be installed on the computers receiving the binaries? Do I
have to cobble up an openssl
Hi, Robert,
After I re-read your email, I think there are some confusion.
The '[' ']' we were discussing refers that in fuction netsnmp_tcp6(udp6)_frmaddr(),
not command line. Attached is my fix for netsnmp_tcp6(udp6)_frmaddr().
The command line argument is different problem. That's tcp6 doesn'
Bruce Shaw wrote:
Encryption suport: DES AES128 AES192 AES256
[...]
To get the extras, do I simply upgrade openssl or do I need a newer gcc?
The former: upgrade OpenSSL.
Will upgrading openssl break other applications relying open ssl?
That depends on the applications and how you compiled and insta
I'm compiling net-snmp-5.1.2 across a variety of Solaris platforms and
getting different results.
I'm assuming it's because of differences between gcc and openssl versions.
FOr example, on a sun4m Solaris 8 box using gcc 3.3 and openssl 0.9.7d I
get:
Authentication support: MD5 SHA1
Encryption
Thanks. That means my fix is correct, right?
Fong
-Original Message-
From: Robert Story (Coders) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 12:23 PM
To: Fong Tsui
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Michael J. Slifcak
Subject: Re: Get data using Tcp6
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 19:08:25 -0700
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 19:08:25 -0700 Fong wrote:
FT> snmpwalk -c public tcp6:[fe80::2e0:81ff:fe25:8097]:161 ucdavis
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 19:15:15 -0700 Fong wrote:
FT> I don't know why we need [' ']' there.
I believe it is to allow for easier parsing. The delimiter is ':', and that
works great for
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:57:51 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> > I know there has been a thread going on man pages, but with the CVS code
DS> > downloaded last night I get the following on make install;
DS> [snip]
DS> > Maybe that has been fixed.
DS>
DS> It was fixed on the 5.1.x line.
DS> I've just appl
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 12:32:54AM +0200, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 10:21:52PM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 19:52:25 +0200, Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > Magnus> Recently the (CVS) agent have started to default associate the
>
Hi,
I got this error:
configure: WARNING: netinet6/nd6.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: netinet6/nd6.h: check for missing prerequisite
headers?
configure: WARNING: netinet6/nd6.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING: netinet6/nd6.h: section "Present But C
23 matches
Mail list logo
