Goodbye SNMP? Hello, WS-Management

Relevant slashdot article: http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/10/08/1944219&tid=95&tid=185&tid=218 -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Archive: You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards,

Re: Bug 1029462

On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 10:14:45AM -0400, Robert Story wrote: > On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 14:48:57 +0200 Magnus wrote: > MF> This patch s about accepting agentx packages where the first 20 bytes are > MF> mangled, could someone elaborate on what is wrong about it? > > Who says there is anything wrong wit

Re: Debian patches

Here is the link to the patch mentioned below http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/n/net-snmp/net-snmp_5.1.2-5.diff.gz Best Regards, -Mike Slifcak Robert Story (Coders) wrote: On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 19:13:37 -0400 Michael wrote: MJS> 1.APPLIED Wrapped SO_BSDCOMPAT socket option setting from MJS>

Re: configure, kernels, functionality [bug 1043197]

Robert Story (Coders) wrote: On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 07:30:15 -0400 Michael wrote: MJS> I've behaved badly yesterday. My apologies to all. I wouldn't go that far. I think we all appreciate your effort in trying to merge in vendor patches. It is a long overdue effort. And I know you are trying to get a

Re: Debian patches

On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 19:13:37 -0400 Michael wrote: MJS> 1.APPLIED Wrapped SO_BSDCOMPAT socket option setting from MJS>snmplib/snmpUDPDomain.c and from MJS>snmplib/snmpUDPIPv6Domain.c MJS> with netsnmp_os_prematch('Linux', "2.4") This got backed out, but I think the basic idea can go back

Re: configure, kernels, functionality [bug 1043197]

On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 07:30:15 -0400 Michael wrote: MJS> I've behaved badly yesterday. My apologies to all. I wouldn't go that far. I think we all appreciate your effort in trying to merge in vendor patches. It is a long overdue effort. And I know you are trying to get as much into 5.2 as possible,

Re: net-snmp-5.1.0: snmpd: send_trap: Unknown PDU type

On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 04:44:33 -0600 Kalpana wrote: KS> Please let me know is there any patch available on net-snmp-5.1.0 SLES. There are lots of patches available for 5.1.0. We call them 5.1.2. Better yet, try the V5-1-patches CVS branch for the up-to-date code that will eventually become 5.1.3.

Re: Bug 1029462

On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 14:48:57 +0200 Magnus wrote: MF> This patch s about accepting agentx packages where the first 20 bytes are MF> mangled, could someone elaborate on what is wrong about it? Who says there is anything wrong with it? There is no comment indicating it was rejected. If you are simply

Bug 1029462

Hi. This patch s about accepting agentx packages where the first 20 bytes are mangled, could someone elaborate on what is wrong about it? /MF --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your

Re: How to create a simple octet string variable

Vinicius> I'm trying to extend the agent, and my MIB has some integer Vinicius> and octet string objects. Vinicius> I've followed the example (scalar_int) to create my integer Vinicius> objects (netsnmp_register_int_instance) and it worked fine. Vinicius> But I've got problems to create the octet s

Re: Proposal: host specific snmp.conf configuration

Wes> How about: Wes> host=*.example.com defCommunity public Wes> We have no tokens that have a = sign in them to date... *We* don't, no - but can you guarantee that nobody else has? Is this syntax explicitly forbidden in either the documentation or the config token parsing code? (Open questio

Re: configure, kernels, functionality [bug 1043197]

Robert Story (Coders) wrote: On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 14:10:25 -0400 Michael wrote: MJS> Robert Story wrote: MJS> > MJS> fix bug#1043197 - provide a function to test os version and release MJS> > MJS> > I don't think this is the right way to do this. I think this should be a MJS> > configure time test,