> On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:32:26 +0100, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Wes> We should only modify files explicitly persistent in nature,
Dave> I never proposed doing anything else!
Dave> A directive marked as "persistent" would be first read from the
Dave> 'static' config file and the v
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:16:01 -0700, Tony Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Tony> Any idea why opensnmp only support v3? I would love to use it
Tony> if it support v1, and v2 similar to net-snmp.
Actually, it wouldn't take much work. The architecture is very
flexible and should allow for it fa
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:33:21 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SN> > > #-#-#-#-#-#-#-#
SN> > > net-snmp-5.0.8-readonly.patch
SN> > > This change to netsnmp_wrap_up_request fixing a problem with
SN> > > processing RO vs RW objects (I'm not sure) was applied in a different
SN> > > source location.
SN> >
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:16:01 -0700 Tony wrote:
TL> > [...] the project was somewhat constrained in that it was meant to follow
TL> > the processing model outlined in the SNMPv3 RFCs.
TL>
TL> Any idea why opensnmp only support v3? I would love to use it if it
TL> support v1, and v2 similar to net
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:45:13 -0200 Ivens wrote:
IP> Then I changed the main loop code to use snmp_select_info() because
IP> there is one extra file descriptor that my application needs to watch for.
IP>
IP> memset(&tv, 0, sizeof(tv));
Try setting the timeout value to some large value. snmp_
Hello,
I'm embedding an agentx sub-agent in my application and I'm having an
odd behavior that I don't know it's normal or not.
Everything was working fine when the main loop for my sub-agent was
while (1) {
agent_check_and_process(1);
}
GET/SET and sending traps/informs where all working.
Th
> SMUX protocol doesn't support multi var-bind.
That's not correct.
RFC 1227 states:
[Section 3]
When the SNMP agent receives an SNMP GetRequest-PDU, GetNextRequest-
PDU, or SetRequest-PDU the SNMP agent sends an
equivalent SNMP PDU containing only those variabl
