> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:56:51 +0100 (BST), supreeth v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
supreeth> I am very new to snmp. I have been given the task to extend
supreeth> a printer mib. I am using net-snmp 5.2.1 and my OS is linux
supreeth> 9.0. Using mib2c i have generated .c and .h files. I am
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 00:24:39 -0400, Aaron Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Aaron> I recently moved net-snmp-5.2.1 to "stable" for our x86 users
Aaron> but just noticed that make test fails:
You can likely ignore those errors which are probably the more host
specific problems to test.
--
W
Hi everyone
I am very new to snmp. I have been given the task to extend a printer mib. I am using net-snmp 5.2.1 and my OS is linux 9.0. Using mib2c i have generated .c and .h files. I am stuck up here. I dont know what to do next. Do i need to make any changes in these two files. On what does t
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 02:46, Hongjunli wrote:
> Why do I get such response when using command "snmptable"?
What was the exact command you ran?
"snmptable "
>
> LocalIPAddrRemoteIPAddr LocalPort RemotePort
>
> 86.102.137.103 101.71.120.106
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 12:16, Hongjunli wrote:
> _load(netsnmp_cache *cache, void *vmagic) can be used to
> load table data,but I don't know how to use parameters cache
> and vmagic.
'cache' is the data structure controlling the cache handling.
You probably don't want to meddle with this.
The
[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying
any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time
or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy.
Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn
and offer advice. Thanks. ]
On Tue
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 08:41, Farazad Farhadzadeh wrote:
> Can you help me about community between agent and kernel.
> I want to know when agent want to set a value for requested
> object agent how receive this value from kernel?
Look - I've just been answering this on the -users list.
What it the
_load(netsnmp_cache *cache, void *vmagic) can be used to load table
data,but I don't know how to use parameters cache and vmagic. Do these two
patameters take some index parameters? I want to load data according to
index.Can I do such?
Hi
Can you help me about community between agent and kernel.
I want to know when agent want to set a value for requested object agent
how receive this value from kernel?
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI.
Version
Why do I get such response when using command "snmptable"?
LocalIPAddrRemoteIPAddr LocalPort RemotePort
86.102.137.103 101.71.120.106 5678 9876 Wrong Type (should be
Gauge32 or Unsigned32):
86.118.137.103 101.151.120.106 8987
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 20:23, 02MCMC43-mca-Yirdaw Gashaw wrote:
> When I check the value of "request->requestvb->val.string" at
> the begining of "MODE_SET_RESERVE1", it has additional characters
> at it's end than the new string value I
> entered with snmpset command.
And what about 'request->req
While I am trying to set a string value in my table (implemented using
table iterator method), the setting of the value takes place, but some
characters
added at the end of the new value. When I check the value of
"request->requestvb->val.string" at the begining of "MODE_SET_RESERVE1",
it has addit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings,
I recently moved net-snmp-5.2.1 to "stable" for our x86 users but just noticed
that make test fails:
-
47:testing RFC-1213 MIB SNMPv1 access
47.9:Access table at.atTable by SNMPv
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 09:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ã
> > what happens if you shut down the agent, remove this file,
> > and then re-start the agent? Does it recreate this file or not?
>
> I shutdown the agent, remove this file, snmpd.conf was recreated
> again, found following lines:
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 19:27, mark kaplun wrote:
> What is the point of sending an snmpv3 GET to an agent which does
> not support snmpv3?
There isn't any point in doing that, no.
But we're not really talking about sending a request. At least,
not from the point of view of the application develope
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 18:18, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> 5) thus, I would choose one of:
>a) have the new behaviour to probe later with a new flag to probe immed.
Well, we've already got a flag to do this (sort of).
It's called "DONT_PROBE".
Or rather, it's the *absence* of the "DONT_PROBE" flag.
I
16 matches
Mail list logo