Hi,
What are the major differences between Net-SNMP toolkit and EMANATE SNMP
research Toolkit.
And what are the advantages/disadvantages of Net-SNMP toolkit over EMANATE
SNMP research Toolkit?
Thanks,
Guru
---
SF email is sponsored by - The
Hello,
Was wondering why you would implement 2233(proposed
standard) instead of 2863(draft standard and obsoletes
2233)?
Robert Wilcox
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Produ
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 15:56:57 +0100 (BST), Mayuresh Dhagamwar <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
Mayuresh> I want to know whether net-snmp package supports RFC2233
Mayuresh> MIB? If not, could you please tell me, if I want to
Mayuresh> implement/support RFC2233 using net-snmp then how should I
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 10:56:03 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> Quoting Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
DS> > I was thinking that mayb table_data2/table_row could just go away.
DS> > It's really just a few wrapper functions around table_container,
DS> > so I'd say move those functions into table_container, an
I tried to add a varbind to set the snmpTrapAddress,
but no luck, the resulting pdu does not have the
agent_address set as they say in the RFC:
oid objid_snmpTrapAddress[] = { 1, 3, 6, 1, 6, 3, 18,
1, 3, 0 };
snmp_add_var(pdu, objid_snmpTrapAddress,
sizeof(objid_snmpTrapAddress)
[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying
any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time
or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy.
Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn
and offer advice. Thanks. ]
On Wed,
What you are probably looking for is the error code which are contained in
the pdu. After verifying that the status==0 (a response was recieved inside
the defined time frame) you have to look inside the returned pdu to check
for error by inspecting the response->errstat field.
Mark.
- Origi
hi,
where can i find documentation of the function
snmp_synch_response?
look at this code
int status,df;
df =
read_objid("HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.8",
id_oid1, &id_len1);
snmp_add_null_var(pdu, id_oid1, id_len1);
status = snmp_synch_response(sess_handle, pdu[nm-1],
&respo
On Sun, 2005-04-24 at 19:31, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> I have to admit that it is pretty annoying that these tests fail if
>
> * Any of SNMPv1 or SNMPv2c ain't configured
That could presumably be handled by a suitable SKIPIP in the
main T16[01]rfc1213 driver.
E.g.
#!/bin/sh
