Shobana Sampath wrote:
It now receives the PDU but says:
Cannot find TrapOID in TRAP2 PDU
What did you use to send the test trap? If you used
snmptrap, what was
the command you used?
I did not use snmptrap to send the trap, I am using my
own SNMP server application for our product.
I placed the c
On an ethereal trace after doing what is described
below, I had to also add this code because I noticed
that snmp_pdu_build does not add the agent_addr for
v2c traps
cp = asn_build_string(cp, pkt_len,
(u_char) (ASN_IPADDRESS |
ASN_PRIMITIVE),
(u
The version is 5.2.1, and the release (that i must use) is redhat's
10.FC3. The srpm can be found here (
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/3/SRPMS/
).
You're right that callback.c doesnt check what kind of sc_client_arg exists.
Raul
On 5/13/05, Robert Story <[EMA
Setting the trap-source-address as described below, I
do not see that in the PDU dump. I am running Ethereal
and that does not show the trap-source-address either.
Thanks.
/Shobana
--- Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 16:38, Shobana Sampath wrote:
> > I tried to add a
On Thu, 12 May 2005 15:06:37 -0400 W wrote:
WRS> I would like to bring attention to the double-free error that occurs
WRS> when shutting down a sub-agentx application. The error occurs in the
WRS> 2.5.1.1 release (and is incorrectly patched by redhat for its release
WRS> of a 2.5.1.10).
I can on
On Thu, 12 May 2005 06:10:07 -0400 Pedot, wrote:
PW> Does the Instance in a table always has to be equal to the index?
The index is the instance, so yes, they are always the same.
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid
On Wed, 11 May 2005 23:42:33 +0200 Magnus wrote:
MF> In include/net-snmp/agent/snmp_agent.h netsnmp_set_request_error and
MF> netsnmp_set_mode_request_error both have the comment 'deprecated, use
MF> netsnmp_request_set_error instead'. In agent/snmp_agent.c there is a
MF> similar comment that point
On Fri, 13 May 2005 03:50:00 -0700 (PDT) Ajit wrote:
AB> This seems pending. We've table implementation for
AB> NOTIFICATION mib. But filtering doesn't happen.
AB>
AB> We've added to the implementation to filter the traps
AB> based on entries in the snmpNotifyFilterTable. Thus
AB> the TARGET/NOTIF
On Thu, 12 May 2005 20:32:31 -0600 Bruce wrote:
BS> >mibII/interfaces.c: In function `var_ifEntry':
BS> >mibII/interfaces.c:1333: error: `Name' undeclared (first use in this
BS> >function)
BS>
BS> Yeah, that's cause it's spelled wrong. The reference in line 1333 should
BS> be"name". Problem is,
Hi all,
This seems pending. We've table implementation for
NOTIFICATION mib. But filtering doesn't happen.
We've added to the implementation to filter the traps
based on entries in the snmpNotifyFilterTable. Thus
the TARGET/NOTIFICATION support is almost complete.
Almost because the 'snmpNotifyF
10 matches
Mail list logo
