On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 09:39:20AM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 19:12 +0200, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:52:35PM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
>
> > > In fact, it might be sensible for the OSI and Appletalk
> > > transport-specific parsing code to check
Robert Story wrote:
I just did a fresh checkout to a new directory, then
./configure --with-defaults --enable-mfd-rewrites
make
make test
and got
Summary: 46 / 46 succeeded.
Me, too! :o
Strange. Dave, what about you?
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders
I looked at net-snmp.org but couldn't find a description of your code
versioning scheme -- e.g. 5.0.10.2. What causes the various numbers to be
incremented?
_
Lisa A. Morgan
IBM Printing Systems
T/L 263-5059
303-924-5059
---
S
Ugh... the situation is what I feared :) See comments inline...On 9/9/05, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 09:15 -0700, John McCaskey wrote:> I was under the impression from reading
> http://www.net-snmp.org/docs/README.thread.html that as long as I> stuck to the Single
Robert Story wrote:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 09:44:50 -0700 Tom wrote:
TC> Where did I got wrong?
The code is right, so you've hit a bug somewhere.
I'm surprised. I assumed that there were a lot of people using this
code in the same manner I am, so if there were any bugs, someone would
have h
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:20:16 +0200 Thomas wrote:
TA> Robert Story wrote:
TA> > On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 12:11:29 +0100 Dave wrote:
TA> > DS> On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 12:52 +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
TA> > DS> > CVS MAIN is broken for me (on Linux/x86). "make test" fails,
TA> > DS> > because the agent cras
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 10:09:21 +0530 Naganarasimha wrote:
N> The mibs which come under"iso.org.dod.internet.mgmt.mib-2" should it be
N> available irrespective of any OS?
No. It's entirely up to the agent device. There are some standard mibs that
are 'required' to claim full compliance with the
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 09:44:50 -0700 Tom wrote:
TC> I believe I'm confused on the use of MFD_SKIP. We have a table and
TC> used mib2c -c mib2c.mfd.conf to build our skeleton code. I haven't
TC> implemented one of our objects yet, so I just wanted return MFD_SKIP, to
TC> get snmpwalk to, "skip" ove
I believe I'm confused on the use of MFD_SKIP. We have a table and
used mib2c -c mib2c.mfd.conf to build our skeleton code. I haven't
implemented one of our objects yet, so I just wanted return MFD_SKIP, to
get snmpwalk to, "skip" over it. Here's a code snippet:
/**
* Extract the current value
On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 00:45 +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Dave Shield wrote on 2004-08-23(!):
> > Dave> But one of the major tasks is to go through the existing debug
> > statements
> > Dave> and come up with a suitable hierarchical debug token structure.
> > Dave> (Plus identifying where we reall
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 09:15 -0700, John McCaskey wrote:
> I was under the impression from reading
> http://www.net-snmp.org/docs/README.thread.html that as long as I
> stuck to the Single Session API for forming and sending requests I
> would be ok. However, it appears that while this is true for
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 19:12 +0200, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:52:35PM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
> > In fact, it might be sensible for the OSI and Appletalk
> > transport-specific parsing code to check for these common
> > port numbers, and convert them into the equivalent
12 matches
Mail list logo
