On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 09:34:03AM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
>
> I'd suggest that, as a basic rule of thumb, objects should
> be owned by the code module that created them.
>
> If memory is allocated by a library routine as part of creating
> or processing something, then that section of the libra
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 05:43:07PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> I just ran a long snmpwalk -m all -OSX ... with a snmpwalk of 4th July, and
> got a core dump at mib.c:4201
> 4201if (tp->next_peer &&
> essentially because tp==(struct tree *)0. mib.c hasn't changed since
I just ran a long snmpwalk -m all -OSX ... with a snmpwalk of 4th July, and
got a core dump at mib.c:4201
4201if (tp->next_peer &&
essentially because tp==(struct tree *)0. mib.c hasn't changed since
15th June, but I'll build again just in case.. In the meantime here is
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:31:06 -0400 rh wrote:
R> - Original Message -
R> > There is a function that sets the default sockopts for udp sockets:
R> > _netsnmp_udp_sockopt_set(), but that would set it for all created sockets.
R>
R> I've got 5.1.3.1 sources and I can't yet find this function o
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:52:53 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 12:22 -0400, Robert Story wrote:
DS> > The reason I did it that way is the multitude of ways that exist
DS> > to specify transport information. e.g. trapsinks, which have an
DS> > optional port as the last parameter.
DS>
DS>
AOn Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:45:25 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 12:22 -0400, Robert Story wrote:
DS> > On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:32:39 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> > DS> Robert and I have been suggesting different forms of how to represent
DS> > DS> the requested service - either a string-based tok
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:01:41PM +0800, ?? wrote:
> When I add a C file in the netsnmpmibs project, it works great.But
> when I change the C file into Cpp file without changing the file
> content,it gives me an error.
>
> When I build snmpd,it can't find the mib init function which works
> w
> By using 'snmpwalk' (or a sequence of GETNEXT
> requests)
> to work through the ipAdEntIfIndex values, looking
> for
> the value(s) that match your required interface
> index.
Thx but how i can do this using c code/?? The
snmp_synch_responce gets as parameter an oid value ..
How i can run many g
When I add a C file in the netsnmpmibs project, it works great.But
when I change the C file into Cpp file without changing the file
content,it gives me an error.
When I build snmpd,it can't find the mib init function which works
well in C file.
Who can tell me what happens and how can I solve the
Thanks Robert.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Story [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 3:10 PM
To: Donghai Ma
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Help: Unresolved getdtablesize while building snmpd.exe with MS
.Net (MSVC7.1)
On Tue, 13 Sep 2
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 09:36 -0400, rh wrote:
> struct c
> {
> struct a ;
> struct b ;
> } ;
>
> Given a pointer to 'a' in 'struct c', as we all know you can
> access / modify 'b' in 'struct c'.
With "in-line" structures as shown - yes, that's possible.
(incredibly ugly, but possible!).
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 12:22 -0400, Robert Story wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:32:39 +0100 Dave wrote:
> DS> Robert and I have been suggesting different forms of how to represent
> DS> the requested service - either a string-based token ("snmpd:receive")
> DS> or an integer ID (which happens to be
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Shield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "RH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: Setting TOS option (newbie)
> On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 12:45 -0400, RH wrote:
> > I need to set the apply getsockopt() and setsockopt() ag
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 12:45 -0400, RH wrote:
> I need to set the apply getsockopt() and setsockopt() against the socket(s)
> used to send SNMP PDUs to an agent. It's a must-have capability to transmit
> packets with a defined TOS option configuration.
> That's obviously better than my admittedly
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 03:49 -0700, Alaios wrote:
> Hi after fetching everything about interfaces now i
> want to store the ipaddresses that the interface
> has...My problem is that
> i dont know what oid i should use so as to fetch the
> ip address...
ipAdEntIfIndex OBJ
Hi after fetching everything about interfaces now i
want to store the ipaddresses that the interface
has... I have used in the past the
status = snmp_synch_response(sess_handle, pdu,
&response); function succesfully.. My problem is that
i dont know what oid i should use so as to fetch the
i
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 12:22 -0400, Robert Story wrote:
> DS> As you've probably gathered, I'm not in favour of splitting the
> DS> transport specification into three separate parameters.
>
> The reason I did it that way is the multitude of ways that exist
> to specify transport information. e.g. t
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 12:25 -0400, Robert Story wrote:
> Just double checking that you noticed he said 5.2.2, not 5.3
Thanks, Robert.
Quite correct - I was thinking in terms of the ramp-up to 5.3.
I withdraw my objection - there is no value in delaying 5.2.2.pre1
at all.
Dave
--
18 matches
Mail list logo
