I would like to run multiple agents on different port in a single managed device(Linux machine) wirh Virtual IP Addresses.
Do anybody have any idea about this?
Thanks
Hello , friends
I want to manage a group of network devices through a proxy agent on the base of net-snmp. But now I don't know how to start and what to do. Could anyone give me some advice? Is there any API that I can use to write proxy
agent routines and how can I define the interfaces between
> JJLDS> in the file. Then I've added the line
> JJLDS> netsnmp_ds_set_string(NETSNMP_DS_APPLICATION_ID,
>JJLDS> NETSNMP_DS_AGENT_X_SOCKET, "localhost:16100");
>
> Ok, first of all, stop the agent and run it in the foreground in
> debug mode:
>
> snmpd -f -Lo -Dag
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 00:24:30 +0200, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Thomas> Is there a way to allow *all* SNMPv3/USM users to e.g.
Thomas> "log,execute,net"? If there's not, then we'll effectively ruin
Thomas> the advantages of snmptrapd usmUserTable management, won't we?
Thom
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:15:50 +0100, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Dave> The only other candidates for "deprecated" directives that spring
Dave> to mind would be "r[ow]{community,user}" - assuming we want to push
Dave> people towards the new "auth{community,user}" directives instead.
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:02:36 +0200, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Thomas> http://www.iana.org/cgi-bin/enterprise.pl
Thomas> If this script had problems (I haven't tried recently), than
Thomas> this is way off-topic here. Report to IANA using the contact
Thomas> info on thei
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 11:01 -0400, Robert Story wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 14:01:44 +0100 Dave wrote:
> DS> > I do agree with Peder on shared IPv4/IPv6 storage as a char array (and
> DS> > that's what I did for the data access functions for the MFD re-writes).
> DS>
> DS> As a raw character arra
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 14:01:44 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> > I do agree with Peder on shared IPv4/IPv6 storage as a char array (and
DS> > that's what I did for the data access functions for the MFD re-writes).
DS>
DS> As a raw character array, or some vaguely generic structure ?
DS> (similar to "struct so
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:13:40 -0300 Jordan wrote:
JJLDS> in the file. Then I've added the line
JJLDS> netsnmp_ds_set_string(NETSNMP_DS_APPLICATION_ID,
JJLDS> NETSNMP_DS_AGENT_X_SOCKET, "localhost:16100");
Ok, first of all, stop the agent and run it in the foreground in debu
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 07:32 -0400, Robert Story wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:51:09 +0100 Dave wrote:
> DS> The real question is whether network addresses should be
> DS> represented internally in a native-style format
> I think you and I have agreed that, if stored as an integer, it should
> be
SUSE Linux 9.2 and net-snmp 5.0.10.rc2.
Regards,
Jordan Janeiro
Telemídia - PUC-Rio
-- Original Message ---
From: Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jordan Janeiro Lopes da Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 20:34:01 -04
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:51:09 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> The real question is whether network addresses should be
DS> represented internally in a native-style format (struct in_addr,
DS> in_addr_t, struct in6_addr, etc) or in SNMP format (char[])
DS>
DS> At the moment we seem to have a mixture, which is
> I will urge you heavily to not decide upon an internal representation of
> an integer. There is absolutely nothing "natural" about integer as a
> representation of an IPv4 address.
Fair comment.
There's probably a danger of us getting bogged down in detail
before we've clarified the basic prin
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 10:15:50AM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 11:04 +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> > what do people think about adding "deprecated" warnings (documentation
> > and runtime) to directives like "exec" (what else?) in 5.3? Or is 5.3
> > considered too early for
-Coders,
"snmptrapd -H" in 5.2.x and 5.3dev currently lists a few agent-related
tokens that happen to surprise me:
5.2+:
trapsink
trap2sink
informsink
trapsess
rocommunity
rwcommunity
rouser
rwuser
view
access
table
master
agentaddress
...
5.3+:
iquerySecLevel
iquerySecName
iqueryVersion
agen
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 11:04 +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> what do people think about adding "deprecated" warnings (documentation
> and runtime) to directives like "exec" (what else?) in 5.3? Or is 5.3
> considered too early for this?
Depends on the directive.
As far as "exec" is concerned, ther
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 14:29 +0800, tonghz wrote:
> Dear sir:
>I want to obtain my own official segment of MIB tree at
> http://www.iana.org for
> an application form.But when I click at application form,it show me it cannot
> get
> the right page. How can I get a my own official segment of MI
-Coders,
what do people think about adding "deprecated" warnings (documentation
and runtime) to directives like "exec" (what else?) in 5.3? Or is 5.3
considered too early for this?
For exec vs. extend, this would probably call for more verbosity on
"extend" in snmpd.conf(5), though.
+Thom
tonghz wrote:
I want to obtain my own official segment of MIB tree at http://www.iana.org
for
an application form.But when I click at application form,it show me it cannot
get
the right page.How can I get a my own official segment of MIB tree?
http://www.iana.org/cgi-bin/enterprise.pl
If
Dear sir:
I want to obtain my own official segment of MIB tree at http://www.iana.org
for
an application form.But when I click at application form,it show me it cannot
get
the right page.How can I get a my own official segment of MIB tree?
thx a lot.
--
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 17:13 -0300, Jordan Janeiro Lopes da Silva wrote:
> Robert, I've executed both agents with root permission and they write in the
> file. Then I've added the line
> netsnmp_ds_set_string(NETSNMP_DS_APPLICATION_ID,
> NETSNMP_DS_AGENT_X_SOCKET, "localhost
21 matches
Mail list logo
