Re: GETBULK and MFD Tables

> On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 14:56:05 +0200, "Harold J. Ship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: Harold> I've just tried a small example using 5.3.0.1 and GET-BULK with MFD Harold> appears to be ok. Harold> In order to port our agent over, it will take a few days of Harold> effort. We may or may not de

Re: netsnmp_request_info flags (delegated, inclusive)

> On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 19:35:22 +0200, "Makavy, Erez (Erez)" <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> said: Erez> In the structure netsnmp_request_info flags, what are these Erez> flags used for? Erez> int delegated; delegated indicates that you aren't going to handle the request right now and

Re: Question regarding 2 copies of net-snmp in same linux box...

Rajagopal> The main motto of our project is that the SNMPv3 agent Rajagopal> should act as proxy for the SNMPV2 agent when somebody Rajagopal> tries to query the version 2 snmpd. Um, why wouldn't you have one agent that handled both requests? Or is the v2 agent only listening locally and the v3 a

Re: Documentation on netsnmp_mib_handler.

> On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:04:50 +0200, "Makavy, Erez (Erez)" <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> said: Erez> Is there some documentation of the semantics of the netsnmp_mib_handler Erez> interface? There is some stuff in the tutorial, and some examples in agent/mibgroup/examples Erez> (e.g. Erez> 1)

Re: rfc: handle platform specifics at runtime vs. compile time?

Johannes Schmidt-Fischer wrote: I think it's not sufficient to check whether nlist64() is available but configure must check to whether the kernel is a 32-bit or 64-bit kernel (well, the second check is only necessary if nlist64() exists). This just in case that even with a 32-bit kernel the 64-b

Re: rfc: handle platform specifics at runtime vs. compile time?

Robert Story wrote: On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:14:53 +0100 Thomas wrote: TA> IRIX (32-bit) and IRIX64 (64-bit) kernels need different handling TA> (nlist() vs. nslist64()), but there doesn't seem to be an existing TA> define (we currently assume IRIX64 which doesn't exist) to make this TA> decisio

Re: Generating traps in Multi-thread Sub-agent: proposed workaround

[Can you please *NOT* send messages to both mailing lists. It just adds to the support load unnecessarily. I usually delete such messages without responding. I'm making an exception this time because of the subject matter.] On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 21:31 +0200, Makavy, Erez (Ere

agent is not responding..

Hi all, I have one more doubt about dynamically loading a module with the agent without restarting the agent with the help of UCD-DLMOD-MIB .When I  am giving as an example like given in net-snmp tutorial    #snmpd -f -L -DnstAgentPluginObject,dlmod agent is not responding or it si goin

Re: table_helper_handler vs. scalar_group_helper_handler.

Quoting "Makavy, Erez (Erez)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 1) Is there any special reason why these helpers are implemented so differenly? Because scalar objects (or groups of scalar objects) are very different from tables. (a scalar group is a specialized case of a table with one difference being th

table_helper_handler vs. scalar_group_helper_handler.

Hey,   1) Is there any special reason why these helpers are implemented so differenly?   (a scalar group is a specialized case of a table with one difference being that there is no 'entry'.)       2) why does the doesn't the scalar_group_helper_handler  have a for loop for all 'requests'?

Documentation on netsnmp_mib_handler.

Hey,   Is there some documentation of the semantics of the netsnmp_mib_handler interface?   (e.g.       1) what do the parameters represent: netsnmp_mib_handler *handler, netsnmp_handler_registration *reginfo, netsnmp_agent_req

Re: doubt regarding dynamic linking

On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 11:56 +0530, Jobin Jose Sebastin wrote: > but the next command >$snmpset localhost UCD-DLMOD-MIB::dlmodStatus.1 i create > is not working properly it shows that the object was not wrtable.. As Wes has indicated, the most likely problem is access control. Make sure that