Quoting Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
BTW, the patch was checked in for 5.1.4.pre3, since it fixes known
breakage. So we have a week or so before pre4/rc1 to find a better
solution, or breakage in the existing solution...
I'm afraid I'm probably going to have to leave this to you.
The next
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:28:18 + Dave wrote:
DS> On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 12:44 -0500, Robert Story wrote:
DS> > The patch fixes both cases.
DS>
DS> Ummm...
DS> I've had a quick look at the patch, but I'm not totally clear on
DS> exactly how it works and what the implications are. (I'm still
DS>
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 10:49 -0800, Wes Hardaker wrote:
Wes> Can I suggest you try a more recent version though? Say 5.3.0.1
Wes> instead which I know has better support for the windows code?
Check the original report, Wes. James said that he had tried with
both 5.0.10.1 *and* 5.3.0.1
James> mi
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 21:04 +0200, Makavy, Erez (Erez) wrote:
> 1) When setting UCD-SNMP-MIB::versionUpdateConfig = 1,
>what exactly happens:
The agent re-reads the configuration files.
>
> a) Does the master agent deletes and re-creates all tables,
>or does it check only for ch
thanks for the information
with the given details
can you send me the details of the embedded linux system you are using
and also some details how you proceded
i have got some ideas to implement
i am going through it
if it builds successfully i will let you all know
Thanks,
Suddavanda
- Or
Hello
We have ported the NetSNMP suite to embedded Linux with success and our
expirence is that it is just a matter of giving the configure script the
correct set of options as Dave indicates. You will have to consider carefully
which things your embedded Linux system supports and you might nee
