On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 09:26:03AM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
> > TA> It's a start, but I think our current approach of shipping all
> > TA> autoconf variables in net-snmp-config.h is even more flawed than
> > TA> that. See some random Debian bug (wrt. some other software) on the
> > TA> topic:
> >
Dear Sirs
Using STG (SNMP Traffic Grapher: http://leonidvm.chat.ru/) to see short term traffic consumption, I notice NET-SNMP
5.3.1 running on Fedora Core 5 (FC5) is updating traffic counters EVERY 30 SECONDS. in opposite to standard EVERY SECOND on v.5.2.1 (FC4).
I tried to figure out if the
Thanks for that tip, Dave! I was already looking at those functions,
using a few printf() around the code, but they were strange.
I went debugging with GDB, and now things are getting even stranger.
I've set the breakpoint at the last 'if' condition it checked before
returning.
(gdb) b agent_trap
Hi,
We are currently using net-snmp for forwarding v1 traps to v3
informs. For the transformation we are using the implementation that is
already coded in net-snmp and that is following the RFC 3584. However,
the NM is not understanding the traps format when these are forwarded. I
know tha
Hi Dave,
Thank you very much for your advice. I will try.
Another question about linkup trap, can I just use only 1 varbind list to
send all the interfaces generated linkup trap? I mean by using
"snmp_varlist_add_variable", bind all the interfaces into the same list one
by one.
Thanks
Li
On 22/08/06, Li Gan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>But when the program running into the second interface,
> by debugging, when arriving "snmp_varlist_add_variable", the program dumped.
Ah. I see a problem.
You're freeing the previous varbind list at the end of the loop, but
the link
Hi,
Thank you for your answer.
In fact, I used my own timer to collect link status very 3 second, I start
my timer just before the receive() function in snmpd.c.
My issue is that there 2 interfaces, for the first interface, program
running fine, but when running to the second interface, at the
Hi Dave,
Thank you for you answer.
My issue is that there are 2 interfaces, for the first interface, I can use
"snmp_varlist_add_variable" and then use "send_v2trap(linktrap_vars)", the
program looks fine. But when the program running into the second interface,
by debugging, when arriving "snmp_
On 22/08/06, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> DS> Something like
> DS> #ifndef OMIT_PROBLEMATICAL_SETTINGS
>
> If we don't use those, I wouldn't include them by default...
Fine.
I was assuming that the default would be to provide the same set of
definitions that we've always done (for bac
> "JP" == Jenny Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JP> #include
JP> #include
JP> The problem seems to be that the header files within mibgroup are not
JP> copied in /usr/local/include. Is it a bug in the Makefile. Or am I
JP> doing something wrong?
No, you're right. We've been wanting to fi
> "DS" == Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> Is it really that unimaginable that a different package might also
DS> define LOGFILE?
Sure!
No, just kidding of course.
DS> a) Net-SNMP-specific settings - stuff that's only meaningful to our code.
DS> (e.g. DEFAULT_MIBDIRS, USE_REVERS
> "DS" == Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> Something like
DS> #ifndef OMIT_PROBLEMATICAL_SETTINGS
If we don't use those, I wouldn't include them by default...
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.
-
Using Tomcat but n
> "LG" == Li Gan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
LG> Am I right? unfortunately, it doesn't work, please help me ,
LG> thanks!
It's unclear where the code is being executed? It won't work during
the init_XXX() phases of your code, but if you set an snmp_alarm and
put it in a function for after th
On 22/08/06, Li Gan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can I add auto linkUp trap in my code?
Which version of the agent are you using?
For recent releases, please see the snmpd.conf(5) man page, and the
description of the
"linkUpDownNotifications" directive.
> What I did is as following:
[snip
Hi,
How can I add auto linkUp trap in
my code?
What I did is as following:
oid if_index_oid[] = {1,3,6,1,2,1,2,2,1,1,1};
oid link_up_oid[] = { 1,3,6,1,6,3,1,1,5, 4 };
oid snmptrap_oid[] = { 1,3,6,1,6,3,1,1,4, 1, 0 };
int i;
netsnmp_variable_list *linktrap_vars=NULL;
On 22/08/06, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shouldn't we also align everything to output the new disman/event name
> instead of the former disman/event-mib, then?
Yes.
> Is there anyone else who thinks this is confusing?
Yes.
Fixed.
Dave
(the monosyllabic)
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 06:10, shanmuga mari wrote:
> Has anyone used NET-SNMP in RT Linux platform?
yes, we use net-snmp with buildroot based system on ppc.
checkout the build environment from http://buildroot.uclibc.org/
claus
---
Dave Shield wrote:
>> TA> I tend to think that e.g. the disman/event-mib warnings aren't as
>> TA> appropriate as in 5.3 anymore and should be relaxed.
>>
>> I'd tend to agree.
>
> I'd tend to have removed the warning, then :-)
Shouldn't we also align everything to output the new disman/event nam
[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying
any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time
or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy.
Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn
and offer advice. Thanks. ]
On 22/08
Robert Story wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 00:01:33 +0200 Thomas wrote:
> TA> Another proposal that came up on IRC was to split net-snmp-config.h into
> an
> TA> external and an internal header file (with the PACKAGE_* variables being
> TA> in the internal one, of course).
>
> I would like to see
On 22/08/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How to send snmp traps using net-snmp
Please read the FAQ entry:
How do I send traps and notifications?
Dave
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support
Hi
I forgot to mention the net-snmp version I am using. Its
5.3.1.
Regards
Jenny
Original Message
Subject:
Problem while compiling
Date:
Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:32:04 +0530
From:
Jenny Paul <[EMAIL PRO
Hi
I have a problem while compiling my application. I am calling
the following functions for access control
init_vacm_vars();
init_usmUser();
I have included the following #include directives
#include
#include
The problem seems to be that the header files wit
How to send snmp traps using net-snmp
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSpher
On 22/08/06, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed in general. Still, where would you suggest to put the PACKAGE_*
> variables in that picture?
c) They're clearly generically named, but the values are Net-SNMP specific.
> Actually, they look too problematic to be put anywhere. :-(
Dave Shield wrote:
> As I see it, there are three general types of entry in the config.h file:
>
>a) Net-SNMP-specific settings - stuff that's only meaningful to our code.
> (e.g. DEFAULT_MIBDIRS, USE_REVERSE_ASNENCODING, etc)
[...]
> b) Generic system-related settings
> (e
> TA> It's a start, but I think our current approach of shipping all
> TA> autoconf variables in net-snmp-config.h is even more flawed than
> TA> that. See some random Debian bug (wrt. some other software) on the
> TA> topic:
>
> TA> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=363173
Wes> We
Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 12:03:05AM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
>> Robert Story wrote:
>>> On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:29:17 -0700 Wes wrote:
>>> WH> And that's included automatically by what file? Or is included
>>> WH> explicitly by what files?
>>>
>>> Well, as near as I can
28 matches
Mail list logo
