I've published 5.4.rc1 to the Net-SNMP download site:
https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=12694&package_id=11571&release_id=448774
This release contains a number of patches that have been created since
5.4.pre4. The details of those patches can be seen in the ChangeLog
fi
On 31/10/06, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, then you convinced me that it wasn't safe at the moment without a
> better analysis. I think it should hold off for rc2 (since I just
> packaged rc1) and thus the vote is now 2-1 instead with you at +0?
I wasn't intending to explicitly vo
> "DS" == Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> You'd asked whether Thomas had done an analysis of everywhere
DS> the NETSNMP_LOOKUP macro was used. I was just trying to
DS> supply such an analysis.
Ok, then you convinced me that it wasn't safe at the moment without a
better analysis.
On 31/10/06, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The good reason is that Dave said he doesn't think it was the right
> solution, which means a -1 which meant it was 3-1 which is not +3.
That's probably a little strong.
The basic idea seems sound - but I had reservations about a couple
of asp
> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TA> devbox# grep -r NETSNMP_KLOOKUP . | grep '<'
TA> ./agent/mibgroup/mibII/ipv6.c:if (NETSNMP_KLOOKUP(p, (char *)
&in6pcb,
TA> I'm sorry to say that this has always been broken code since
TA> klookup will never return anything else
> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> "DS" == Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
DS> I'm not sure that this patch is quite right.
>>
>> I'm going to take that as a -1 and remove it from .rc1
TA> I fail to see a good reason for doing so, sorry. See my reply to
T
Wes Hardaker wrote:
>> "DS" == Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> DS> I'm not sure that this patch is quite right.
>
> I'm going to take that as a -1 and remove it from .rc1
I fail to see a good reason for doing so, sorry. See my reply to Dave's comments
for details.
+Thomas
--
Dave Shield wrote:
> I'm not sure that this patch is quite right.
>
> Most of the uses of NETSNMP_LOOKUP (in mibII/*.c) don't check the
> return value at all. So the code looks something like:
>
>NETSNMP_LOOKUP(x, (char *)&buf, sizeof(buf));
>
> which would expand to
>
>(0);
>
> Is th
> "DS" == Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> I'm not sure that this patch is quite right.
I'm going to take that as a -1 and remove it from .rc1
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thomas,
> I'm calling for votes to include this in 5.4.
Definitely a +1 from me. In Debian, we used a special version of libtool to get
rid of
unneeded dependencies as they really are a nightmare for distributions.
See http://lists.debian.org/de
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:34:51PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> Definitely a +1 from me. In Debian, we used a special version of libtool to
> get rid of
> unneeded dependencies as they really are a nightmare for distributions.
>
> See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg0
>je suis un débutant dans le domaine de la supervision
>j'ai installer net-snmp version 5.1.4 pour fedora 4
>j'ai crée le fichier de configuration snmpd.conf
>mais lorsque je teste avec la commande snmpget il me revoie le message
>suivant :
>snmpget: Timeout
>la comande que je lance est snmpget -v
Bonjour
je suis un débutant dans le domaine de la supervision
j'ai installer net-snmp version 5.1.4 pour fedora 4
j'ai crée le fichier de configuration snmpd.conf
mais lorsque je teste avec la commande snmpget il me revoie le message
suivant :
snmpget: Timeout
la comande que je lance est snmpget
On 31/10/06, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Applied. Personally, I think this is not a minor change at all. I
> agree it's probably the right thing to do, but without reviewing that
> all calls to it successful watch out for a 0 return should be done.
> Have you done such an analysis?
> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TA> Wouldn't this also call for a more defined point in time for the actual
TA> releases? :-P
We've had defined points in time for a long time.
TA> Seriously, you've been calling for opinions on when to release rc1
TA> within the Oct 27-29
> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TA> PS. I'm also begging the honorable Release Manager to seriously
TA> consider to apply this for 5.4.rc1 if just not enough people had
TA> the chance to comment/vote on this before rc1 due to the short
TA> notice (my fault, due to lack of t
-Original Message-
From: Wes Hardaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:17 AM
To: Bruce Shaw
Cc: Net-Snmp-Coders (E-mail)
Subject: Re: There's a tiny bug in sensors
> "BS" == Bruce Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BS> I just found out on -users that fan se
> "BS" == Bruce Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BS> I just found out on -users that fan sensors aren't being reported on
BS> 240-class Sun servers.
Applied to head, FYI. Please apply to other branches (5.3 and 5.2).
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:23:32 -0700 Bruce wrote:
BS> I just found out on -users that fan sensors aren't being reported on
BS> 240-class Sun servers.
BS>
BS> Picld is reporting the fans differently than what I'm used to. The
BS> infrastructure is already in place for fixing this - it's just a diffe
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:24:27 +0900 Zhang wrote:
ZC> Who can tell me why agent will search B_table continuely?
As Juergen said, the agent will search continuously until it does find a
object, regardless of any table/object boundaries. There was some proposed
work to allow specifying a limiting oid,
taking into account the testing and how trivial the patch is:
+1
darix
--
openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux
openSUSE is good for you
www.opensuse.org
-
Using Tomcat but need to do m
Wes Hardaker wrote:
> One issue that has obviously become a problem is the deadline for
> which patches can be submitted for upcoming releases. Obviously if a
> patch is intended to be considered for a release and it needs the
> mandatory 24 hour voting window, as described in the policy document
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:24:27PM +0900, Zhang Chuan wrote:
> I have two tables in my MIB file. One is A_table, the other is B_table. The
> OID of A_table is:.1.3.6.1.4.1.236.4.6.1.3.1.2. The OID of B_table is:
> .1.3.6.1.4.1.236.4.6.1.3.1.3. Both of A and B tables have no data.
>
> 1. I use Ad
Hi, all:
I have two tables in my MIB file. One is A_table, the other is B_table. The OID of A_table is:.1.3.6.1.4.1.236.4.6.1.3.1.2. The OID of B_table is: .1.3.6.1.4.1.236.4.6.1.3.1.3. Both of A and B tables have no data.
1. I use AdventNet to get the A_table data. The AdventNet sent "getNex
24 matches
Mail list logo
