Re: Public API

2006-11-01 Thread Alex Burger
Magnus Fromreide wrote: > If I understand it correctly functions in the lib that are to b > available on win32 must be listed in win32/libsnmp_dll/libsnmp.def.in. > > If this is correct (could someone who knows windows please correct me if > it isn't) then i propose that the attached patch should

Re: 5.4 ChangeLog busted?

2006-11-01 Thread Wes Hardaker
> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: TA> Wes Hardaker wrote: >> Could one of you please remove the offending sections of the current >> main line changelog file? TA> Done. Thanks. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc.

Re: 5.4 ChangeLog busted?

2006-11-01 Thread Thomas Anders
Wes Hardaker wrote: > Could one of you please remove the offending sections of the current > main line changelog file? Done. +Thomas -- Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de) - Using Tomcat but need to do more?

Re: Demande d'aide

2006-11-01 Thread Dave Shield
[I'm not going to even try responding in French!] On 31/10/06, Bruce Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ce qui est la réponse à > > snmpget -v 1 -c public 192.168.0.3 .1.3 > > ? That should probably be "snmpgetnext " > Pourquoi "..1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0" au lieu de ".1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0"? I've

Re: 5.4 ChangeLog busted?

2006-11-01 Thread Wes Hardaker
> "DS" == Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DS> I'm inclined to agree with Thomas. I think it would be preferable DS> if the ChangeLog file contained a history of the changes that were DS> relevant to that particular branch - i.e. the code that DS> accompanied the log file. Rather than

Re: UCD memory object inconsistencies

2006-11-01 Thread Dave Shield
On 01/11/06, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dave Shield wrote: > >>> b) Should 'memAvailSwapTXT' and 'memAvailRealTXT' report the > >>> amount of memory free, or the amount used? > >>> The MIB object name implies one, the description the other! > How does 5.3.x implement

Re: 5.4 ChangeLog busted?

2006-11-01 Thread Dave Shield
On 01/11/06, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > TA> I've been under the impression that the ChangeLog in each branch would > TA> only cover the changes in that particular branch and *not* try to also > TA> cover the changes in other branches. I.e. the ChangeLog in MAIN would > TA> *not* cove

Re: 5.4 ChangeLog busted?

2006-11-01 Thread Wes Hardaker
> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: TA> I've been under the impression that the ChangeLog in each branch would TA> only cover the changes in that particular branch and *not* try to also TA> cover the changes in other branches. I.e. the ChangeLog in MAIN would TA> *not* cover ch

Re: UCD memory object inconsistencies

2006-11-01 Thread Thomas Anders
Dave Shield wrote: >>> b) Should 'memAvailSwapTXT' and 'memAvailRealTXT' report the >>> amount of memory free, or the amount used? >>> The MIB object name implies one, the description the other! > >> I think it should be clarified in the MIB object description that the >> object nam

Re: 5.4 ChangeLog busted?

2006-11-01 Thread Thomas Anders
Wes Hardaker wrote: > The changelog is really broken up into differences between releases > based on changes in multiple branches. Thus a changelog of everything > unsorted is fairly useless because you don't know which branch it was > applied to. > > So the change log has version "sections" and

Re: 5.4 ChangeLog busted?

2006-11-01 Thread Marcus Rueckert
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 18:49, Wes Hardaker wrote: > Better alternative suggestions welcome (but be prepared to implement > the changes). svn log -v darix -- openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux openSUSE is good for you www.opensuse.org -

Re: 5.4 ChangeLog busted?

2006-11-01 Thread Wes Hardaker
> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: TA> ChangeLog in CVS MAIN (5.4.rc1) looks strange:. Well, yes and no. The changelog is really broken up into differences between releases based on changes in multiple branches. Thus a changelog of everything unsorted is fairly useless beca

5.4 ChangeLog busted?

2006-11-01 Thread Thomas Anders
ChangeLog in CVS MAIN (5.4.rc1) looks strange:. Around line 6593: - --- snip --- 2005-12-28 11:10 rstory * ChangeLog: version update --- Changes: V5.3 -> V5.3.1 2006-07-13 14:44 hardaker * man/: netsnmp_ag

Re: UCD memory object inconsistencies

2006-11-01 Thread Dave Shield
On 01/11/06, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dave Shield wrote on 2006-02-24: > > a) Should 'memSwapError' monitor 'memAvailSwap' or 'memTotalFree' ? > > Different architectures implement this differently > > I think the MIB descriptions imply monitoring *swap* space, so I'd st

Re: UCD memory object inconsistencies

2006-11-01 Thread Thomas Anders
Dave Shield wrote on 2006-02-24: > As watchers of the CVS list will have realised, I've been doing some > work on the UCD 'memory' group, and I've come across a couple of > inconsistencies, which I thought I'd mention here. > > a) Should 'memSwapError' monitor 'memAvailSwap' or 'memTotalFree' ?

Re: RFV: Public API

2006-11-01 Thread Thomas Anders
Wes Hardaker wrote: >> "MF" == Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > MF> If I understand it correctly functions in the lib that are to b > MF> available on win32 must be listed in > MF> win32/libsnmp_dll/libsnmp.def.in. > > Looks good to me. Assuming others think so, I'll put it i

RFV: Public API

2006-11-01 Thread Wes Hardaker
> "MF" == Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MF> If I understand it correctly functions in the lib that are to b MF> available on win32 must be listed in MF> win32/libsnmp_dll/libsnmp.def.in. Looks good to me. Assuming others think so, I'll put it in 5.4.rc2 -- Wes Hardaker Sparta

Re: Proposal for snmpusm

2006-11-01 Thread Thomas Anders
Passera Pablo-APP015 wrote: > I'm attaching the proposed patch for snmpusm. The version I'm > comparing to is 5.3.0.1 Thanks. Can you post this to the patch tracker (www.net-snmp.org/patches), please? +Thomas -- Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)

Re: rfv: sed fixing patch for configure, etc..

2006-11-01 Thread Wes Hardaker
> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DS> If 'mk' is a directory, then shouldn't this be either "rm -rf mk" or DS> "rmdir mk" ? >> >> Yep. Good catch. TA> Can you post an updated patch with a rfv for rc2, please? The only change from the previous one is the one thing Dave poi

Re: Proposal for snmpusm

2006-11-01 Thread Wes Hardaker
> "PP" == Passera Pablo-APP writes: PP> My proposal for this is to add a new option to the snmpusm PP> application. The new feature looks like a good and well-needed one. Can you please upload it to http://www.net-snmp.org/patches as well to make sure we don't forget about it? We're curren

Proposal for snmpusm

2006-11-01 Thread Passera Pablo-APP015
Hi, I have two proposals for the snmpusnm. First, with the current snmpusm implementation you cannot clone a user with a different engineID than the template, for instance, if you use: ./snmpusm -v 3 -u Admin -l authPriv -a SHA -A Test1 -x AES -X Test1 localhost -CE 0x80001F88046

Re: rfv: sed fixing patch for configure, etc..

2006-11-01 Thread Thomas Anders
Wes Hardaker wrote: >> "DS" == Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > DS> If 'mk' is a directory, then shouldn't this be either "rm -rf mk" or > DS> "rmdir mk" ? > > Yep. Good catch. Can you post an updated patch with a rfv for rc2, please? +Thomas -- Thomas Anders (thomas.anders a

Public API

2006-11-01 Thread Magnus Fromreide
If I understand it correctly functions in the lib that are to b available on win32 must be listed in win32/libsnmp_dll/libsnmp.def.in. If this is correct (could someone who knows windows please correct me if it isn't) then i propose that the attached patch should be added to 5.4.rc2 /MF Index: w