Re: Re: Porting net-snmp to arm platform questions

2007-01-23 Thread liu.renfeng
My detailed configuration is as follow: [EMAIL PROTECTED] net-snmp-5.4]# ./configure --enable-mini-agent --with-mibs="IP-MIB:IF-MIB:TCP-MIB:UDP-MIB:SNMPv2-MIB:RFC1213-MIB" --target=arm-linux --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --host=arm-linux --disable-scripts --disable-embedded-perl --enable-static=yes

RE: USM DH Key change process

2007-01-23 Thread santhosh.sundarasamy
Hi The other process sends V3 notifications to manager. This process uses Net-SNMP APIs to send the same. Since the trigger for notifications are received as HTML (from one server) requests, sending notification to Manager is been made as different process. Please let me know, Is

Re: Re: Porting net-snmp to arm platform questions

2007-01-23 Thread liu.renfeng
Do you succeed in doing it? I need to hava my board to support MIB II and I am really new to SNMP, so I have no idea how to achieve this target. Would you please share your experience to us? Best Regards, Robin Tel: +86-27-8761-7326 Ext: 309 2007-01-24 发件人： Zhang Chuan 发送时间： 2007-01-24

Re: Porting net-snmp to arm platform questions

2007-01-23 Thread Zhang Chuan
Yes, I am just doing this job. Port net-snmp to ARM9 Do you have any problems? Please send us and discuss them. On 1/24/07, liu.renfeng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there anyone have the experience of porting net-snmp to arm platform? Or anyone can give me any suggestion?

Porting net-snmp to arm platform questions

2007-01-23 Thread liu.renfeng
Is there anyone have the experience of porting net-snmp to arm platform? Or anyone can give me any suggestion? Best Regards, Robin Tel: +86-27-8761-7326 Ext: 309 2007-01-24 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Futu

Re: rfc: library layering

2007-01-23 Thread Wes Hardaker
> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> If we went that route, I'd be tempted to install a fairly empty >> libnetsnmphelpers library that at least will let links succeed. TA> Didn't you say "significantly cleaner" in this very same thread? TA> :-P It is. Compared to the alter

Re: rfc: library layering

2007-01-23 Thread Thomas Anders
Wes Hardaker wrote: >> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > TA> Are you proposing to move libnetsnmphelpers content to > TA> libnetsnmpagent and not ship libnetsnmphelpers with 5.5 at all? If > TA> so, are we fine with requiring developers who don't use > TA> net-snmp-config i

Re: rfc: library layering

2007-01-23 Thread Wes Hardaker
> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: TA> Are you proposing to move libnetsnmphelpers content to TA> libnetsnmpagent and not ship libnetsnmphelpers with 5.5 at all? If TA> so, are we fine with requiring developers who don't use TA> net-snmp-config in their Makefiles to manually r

Re: rfc: library layering

2007-01-23 Thread Thomas Anders
Wes Hardaker wrote: > In the end, I still think that moving libhelpers -> libagent entirely > is not only significantly cleaner, it's far less error prone for both > us and users, and 99% of the time going to be what the users need in > the first place. I have yet to be convinced otherwise. Are y

Re: rfc: library layering

2007-01-23 Thread Wes Hardaker
> "RS" == Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RS> D'oh! Note that this patch doesn't include moving the 3 required RS> helper modules, but simply deals with moving the explicit library RS> init call from the agent library into the application. I actually disagree with this solution on a

Re: USM DH Key change process

2007-01-23 Thread Wes Hardaker
> "ss" == santhosh sundarasamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ss> I have to share the updated auth and priv keys to another demon ss> running on the same machine when snmpusm command successfully changed ss> the keys. Is it possible? ss> Is there any specific function / data structure where I ha

Re: Questions

2007-01-23 Thread Wes Hardaker
> "DS" == Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DS> Hmmm... so ten years of twiddling with this code probably makes me DS> subclinically neurotic (or as a psychiatrist would say, stark DS> staring bonkers) I'll vouch for that. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. -

Re: public snmp machines

2007-01-23 Thread Wes Hardaker
> "AV" == Alef Veld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: AV> snmpget -v2c -c public test.net-snmp.org sysUpTime.0 use the community "demopublic" instead. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Futu

Re: public snmp machines

2007-01-23 Thread Alef Veld
Hi, sorry for the late reply. No it isn't working. I get a timeout on the standard port anyway. snmpget -v2c -c public test.net-snmp.org sysUpTime.0 Timeout: No Response from test.net-snmp.org. I tried different versions, no go. Personally, i'd still prefer to have a pool of hosts with different

Re: Questions

2007-01-23 Thread Dave Shield
On 22/01/07, Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If one look in RFC 2741 7.1.10 point 3 then it refers to RFC > > > 2089, but I am uncertain about the meaning of that. > > > > That seems to be referring to how a *sub*agent should deal with a request > > to send a notif

Re: Order of functions in close_agentx_session

2007-01-23 Thread Josef Moellers
Thomas Anders wrote: > Josef Moellers wrote on 2006-11-03: > >>During analysis, I already tried *not* freing certain data structures to >>see how far I got and the first thing I did was deepcopying a >>netsnmp_subtree rather than assigning the pointer in >>netsnmp_add_varbind_to_cache() (reques