Devi,
snmp_parse_args() can be customized for your purpose, but we
wrote our own parsing logic to handle trapsink, and trapsess directive.
Regards,
Santhosh
From: Devi U [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 5:20 PM
To: SANTHOSH S
For the implementation, when the VACM authorization checking is done
over the outgoing trap/inform there are not reference to engineID. So,
should we consider that all the users used to send informs have the same
security level? Even when the USM allows to define the same securityName
with a differ
Chris Black wrote:
> I am compiling net-snmp on OpenBSD-4.0 on an amd64 arch (running in
> 64-bit mode) from ports with the openbsd MIBs patch
> (http://www.packetmischief.ca/openbsd/snmp/) applied. During autoconf I
> got the following warning that seemed to indicate I should notify this
> list, s
On 09/04/07, K R Venkateshan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If that be the case, is the way the SET operation
> works changed from UCD-SNMP to NET-SNMP
> implementations ?
It's not how SET operations per-se are handled that has changed,
but how *AgentX* SET operations are handled.
See
http://net-s
Narayana Smaranas,
Thanks for your response.
If that be the case, is the way the SET operation
works changed from UCD-SNMP to NET-SNMP
implementations ?
In UCD-SNMP, the same subagent code was returning a
"Commit failed" error. But no errors are returned in
Net-snmp.
Narayana Smaranas,
Venk
Santhosh,
I have tried using session for sending traps.There was no increase in memory
usage for each trap sent. Thanx for ur kindly help.I have hardcoded session
variable for testing. As per our existing design of sending traps using
send_v2trap() api, traps were forwarded to management sy
Hi All
My Problem is specifically related to building a snmp manager extension for Tcl
using the net-snmp provided apis.
I am quite new to net-snmp & do not have much insight in the code so I
apologize in advance if this issue has cropped up before in this list.
I am trying to write a Tcl ex
