vxworks support?

hi,all i just see that snmpd support win32 and linux,but whether it also support vxworks. if not ,whether i will change a lot for vxworks,and what should i change? Thanks a lot in advance for your help. zhangyao 2007-06-22

Re: Table2 sharing cache/container of Table1, so can I remove these routines?

Also, since Table2 shares the cache from Table1, then I would assume there is no reason to set the "cache->timeout" and "cache->flags" values in the Table2_container_init() routine . is this correct? Need Help <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Since Table2 is now successfully using the cache and

Table2 sharing cache/container of Table1, so can I remove these routines?

Since Table2 is now successfully using the cache and container from Table1, then I planned on removing the following routines which are specific to Table2. Is this safe to do? These routines do not look like they would be required anymore but I am not sure exactly when they would get called so

Re: Perl module for Net-SNMP -snmpv3

the problem was with snmpUtils.pm that came with cricket - it was passing a "default" context. got rid of it and all is good - Thanks!! Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "AC" == Ajay Chenampara writes: AC> has anyone had success with Net-SNMP for snmpv3? Im just wondering AC> if t

Re: row_prep() returning MFD_SKIP results in error

Excellent news So based on your response, it seems like I can set "processed = 1" in the "_object_lookup()" routine at the same time I set "req->requestvb->type = SNMP_NOSUCHINSTANCE".This seems to be a more general solution which you prefer. My check then could simply check "process

Subagent warnings produced (Implicit declaration of function)

Does anyone know if these "warnings" I am seeing are normal? Need Help <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I created the "ocStbHostMib_subagent_Makefile" file which is based off of the Makefile syntax generated by "mib2c.mfd.conf". I created the "ocStbHostMib_subagent.c" file based off of the "example-

Re: row_prep() returning MFD_SKIP results in error

On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:50:17 -0700 (PDT) Need wrote: NH> I looked around the code a bit and noticed some things which might explain the reason for this occurring. In the "_mfd_ocStbHostAnalogVideoTable_object_lookup()" routine the following code exists: NH> NH> for (req=requests; req;

Re: vp->magic and OID passed by snmpd

On 21/06/07, Shivani Garg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > struct variable7 systemInfo_variables[] = { > #define OVERALLDISKOCCUPANCYINKB 276 > > {OVERALLDISKOCCUPANCYINKB, ASN_UNSIGNED, RONLY, >var_systemDiskStatsNotfyAttrTable, 4, {2, 18, 1, 1}}, > } If you look at the definition of "stru

Fwd: vp->magic and OID passed by snmpd

Sincere Apologies.. I copied the wrong error in my last mail.. I error I get is: RFC1155-SMI::enterprises.6305.1.10.1.2.1.2.18.1.1.1 = No Such Instance currently exists at this OID -- Forwarded message -- From: Shivani Garg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Jun 21, 2007 4:35 PM Subject:

vp->magic and OID passed by snmpd

Greetings to all. I am using the code generated by mib2c for my MIB file. It contains an array like this.. : *oid systemInfo_variables_oid[] = { 1, 3, 6, 1, 4, 1, 6305, 1, 10, 1, 2, 1 };* *struct variable7 systemInfo_variables[] = {* *.* *.* *.* */* Out of all the elements of array, one is below

Re: patch 1737727 and the NOACCESS #define

Ok, looks like it would be logical to change all three of them when any renaming is done. But having such generic defines in a header seems dangerous. At one point or another, there's going to be trouble... On 6/19/07, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Patch 1737727 brings up an interes