Hi Robert,
Looks like some one else was faced this kind of issue before. Please
refer following link for more information.
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=469EA306409F764EB1BE30336A18F3BC081352%40psimail02.usa.ccu.clearchannel.com
In this mail thread, Mikec said after chang
Hi,
Thanks to all for reviewing my patch!
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:39:04 -0700
Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "MC" == Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> MC> Patch 1728247 is created under recognition where the SIZEOF_LONG_LONG
> ...
> MC> I'd like to call for votes to
> "WH" == Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
WH> [This also means (drat) I just generated configure under the older branches
WH> with the wrong autoconf]
Actually, I didn't; never mind that comment...
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.
---
> "GG" == Gustaf Gunnarsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GG> I've submitted a patch that solves this problem now.
GG>
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1746992&group_id=12694&atid=312694
Good problem description, so thanks. However, a better solution would
be to imple
> "JF" == Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JF> KDE is a special case due to the sheer number of libraries and
JF> different versions. bind9 is a better example, here each library is
JF> packaged individually with the correct name derived from the SONAME.
As it sadly, should be don
> "MC" == Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MC> Patch 1728247 is created under recognition where the SIZEOF_LONG_LONG
...
MC> I'd like to call for votes to include it in 5.4.1.
+1 and applied to V5-4-patches and V5-3-patches. However, it doesn't
apply as is to the main trunk and it
> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TA> I'm calling for votes to apply this to 5.4.1.
Probably not needed at this point, but +1
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Expres
+1
>The attached trivial patch makes sure these files get installed with
mode 644 instead of 755 (that's the only difference between $(INSTALL)
and $(INSTALL_DATA), see the top-level Makefile after having run
configure if you want to double-check).
>I'm calling for votes to apply this to 5.4.1.
+1
>Patch 1728247 is created under recognition where the SIZEOF_LONG_LONG
is defined when a platform has long long type. However the
net-snmp-config.h for MSVC has SIZEOF_LONG_LONG definition even if
MSVC doesn't have long long type.
>To match the configure script behavior, it's better to remove
Hi Robert,
Are you able to reproduce this duplicate trap issue? Did any one
reported this issue before? This really critical for us right now. Your
help would be greatly appreciated.
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 14:06 -0400, Robert Story wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:30:48 -0700 Navaneetham wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 21:26:08 +0200 Thomas wrote:
TA> The attached trivial patch makes sure these files get installed with
TA> mode 644 instead of 755 (that's the only difference between $(INSTALL)
TA> and $(INSTALL_DATA), see the top-level Makefile after having run
TA> configure if you want to doub
Mitsuru Chinen wrote:
> I'd like to call for votes to include it in 5.4.1.
+1 (it seems to fix the Windows build problem in question in a
non-trivial, but clean way)
Thanks for the patch!
+Thomas
-
This SF.net email is spo
Hi Wes,
> TA> They ship libnetsnmpagent.so.X (together with
> TA> libnetsnmp{,helpers,mibs}.so.X) inside a package called libsnmpX.
>
> What do they do for other components with differing version numbers (if
> I had time I'd go look for an example to look up but I can't think of
> one off the top
Hi Wes,
> I actually suspect more people fall into that boat than people that will
> make use of the new structure directly in their application. I just
> think most people don't mind recompiling as much as third party
> commercial products running on an OS which just distributed a new
> version
We're currently installing agent/snmp_perl.pl and
apps/snmp_perl_trapd.pl as executables (mode 755), although they are
not. They're used by snmpd/snmptrapd to initialize embedded Perl
support. They *can not* be used as standalone scripts.
rpmlint correctly complains about these files being install
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 15:48:46 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> On 03/07/07, Bruce Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DS> > One of the main challenge with net-snmp migration process is that,
DS> > identifying the SNMP API interface changes between 5.0.9 and 5.4.1 . If
DS> > you have any inputs/pointers how to track
On 03/07/07, Bruce Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of the main challenge with net-snmp migration process is that,
> identifying the SNMP API interface changes between 5.0.9 and 5.4.1 . If
> you have any inputs/pointers how to track the changes it would really
> helpful for speeding up the mig
Sun needs a bit of help.
I know we have the changes file at
http://www.net-snmp.org/docs/CHANGES.html
It's going to be a but much for him to wade through every change in the
SVN repository (assuming it even remembers the CVS changes).
Failing a complete list, does anybody remember any gotchas
Thanks for the recommendation. I will do that.
Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 02/07/07, Need Help wrote:
> I am trying to compile the NetSNMP v5.4 code for Linux. I plan on starting
> the snmpd master agent and then starting a subagent to handle my specific
> OC-STB-HOST-MIB mib
Hi,
I've submitted a patch that solves this problem now.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1746992&group_id=12694&atid=312694
//Gustaf
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Expre
Thanks a lot for your prompt reply on this..
Probably, for my kind of setup, wherein I want more than one sub-agent to
register exactly the same OIDs in the MIB, the later option should be more
approriate. Can you help me with this.. I am using SNMPv2 at my end, where
do I define this context/com
On 02/07/07, Need Help <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to compile the NetSNMP v5.4 code for Linux. I plan on starting
> the snmpd master agent and then starting a subagent to handle my specific
> OC-STB-HOST-MIB mib file. Is it recommended to use the
> "--with-out-mib-modules" option to
On 02/07/07, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reminder:
>
> We are now in the release-candidate part of the 5.4.1 release, which
> means that code related changes to the V5-4-patches branch must be
> approved here by at least a +3 vote.
And that's +3 after a 24-hour voting period - not co
On 03/07/07, Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to call for votes to include it in 5.4.1.
+1
Dave
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express
On 03/07/07, Shivani Garg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to run multiple sub-agents (all running from one IP) all registering
> the same MIB with one snmpd. Is there any way this can be supported using
> agentx protocol so that a GET request for instance-1 of some MIB object (say
> myObject) g
Greetings to all.
I want to run multiple sub-agents (all running from one IP) all registering
the same MIB with one snmpd. Is there any way this can be supported using
agentx protocol so that a GET request for instance-1 of some MIB object (say
myObject) goes to subagent-1 and a request for insta
26 matches
Mail list logo
