Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On fre, 2007-12-21 at 11:56 +1100, Ben Nizette wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I cannot correctly attached agentx subagents to my snmpd. If attempting
>> to use unix sockets, the attach just fails with "No Checked Transport
>> Domain" but that's fine, they attach just OK over udp.
On fre, 2007-12-21 at 11:56 +1100, Ben Nizette wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I cannot correctly attached agentx subagents to my snmpd. If attempting
> to use unix sockets, the attach just fails with "No Checked Transport
> Domain" but that's fine, they attach just OK over udp.
Eh, I suppose you are runnin
Hello,
I cannot correctly attached agentx subagents to my snmpd. If attempting
to use unix sockets, the attach just fails with "No Checked Transport
Domain" but that's fine, they attach just OK over udp.
Once attached over UDP, the ping and response packets head backwards and
forwards just nice
Hello!
Is it a stupid idea to make snmpset able to et values of type NULL?
If it is then I think we should return the 'n' type list in snmpset.
If it isn't then I think we should add support for the 'n' type. It
boils down to the attached patch since most of the support is there
already.
/MF
In
Dave Goodman wrote:
> dltlsec3> make test
[...]
> 1: testing SNMPv1 support... Killed
> Killed
> (no pid file(s) found) FAIL
What happens if you run "agent/snmpd -H" by hand?
See chapter "14. OpenSSL and crle" in README.solaris for the most likely
reason (and fix).
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders
Thanks Thomas, at least it all appears to compile now (I had put the
/usr/ccs/bin in my PATH variable to get 'make' to work, but I'd already
run ./configure at that stage). Now, I'm having a problem with the 'make
test' routine. I've folllowed the Solaris specific instructions -
stopped and disable
