On tor, 2008-05-15 at 16:11 +0200, Jan Safranek wrote:
> Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> > Do the rewrite affect both stream and packet sockets or only stream
> > sockets?
>
> Currently both, but if there will be flag allowing asynchronous write,
> like hardaker is suggesting, I'll have to rewrite it e
Hi Latha,
We had a similar problem going from 5.2.1 to 5.4.1 that was discussed on
this list around April 18. The key fix was to make sure the NetSNMP::OID
call comes AFTER the NetSNMP::agent call. The ordering did not use to matter
but now it does.
Larry Dickson
Cutting Edge Networked Storage
O
Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> Do the rewrite affect both stream and packet sockets or only stream
> sockets?
Currently both, but if there will be flag allowing asynchronous write,
like hardaker is suggesting, I'll have to rewrite it either.
> What action should be taken if the remote party fails to
On ons, 2008-05-14 at 15:51 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was using net-snmp 5.1.4 earlier and we have a subagent communicating
> using agentx with our master agent. Things were working fine.
>
> We are now trying to upgrade to net-snmp 5.4.1 and the master agent and
> the subagent
