Attached
Index: docs/readmefiles/README
===
--- docs/readmefiles/README (revision 17236)
+++ docs/readmefiles/README (working copy)
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@
re-run configure and re-compile (or link against its libraries). No
modifi
This patch fixes a tiny escaping confusion. The current text, while
semantically correct, confuses the VIM syntax highlighting as well as
confused me.
Shachar
Index: configure.ac
===
--- configure.ac(revision 17232)
+++ con
Attached is the patch
Shachar
Index: local/mib2c.scalar.conf
===
--- local/mib2c.scalar.conf (revision 17236)
+++ local/mib2c.scalar.conf (working copy)
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@
* SET REQUEST
*
* multiple state
I have added two additional pages to the Build section of the Wiki for
Windows:
http://www.net-snmp.org/wiki/index.php/Build_System/Windows
http://www.net-snmp.org/wiki/index.php/Build_System/Windows_features
The first shows what releases have been tested to compile under Windows
using the var
Look at this:
http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2005/ruzin-mstp-mib-02.txt
thanks,
Daniel
Chris Nelson wrote:
>Is there such a thing? I'm embarking on an 802.1Q-2005 implementation
>and can't find any MIB text. Surely MSTP can be monitored and
>administered via SNMP. I even have an MS
Hi Angela, when you apply mibc -c c mib2c.iterate.conf you get as a result both
.h file and a .c file.
Example:
/*
* Note: this file originally auto-generated by mib2c using
* : mib2c.iterate.conf,v 5.14 2004/10/14 12:57:33 dts12 Exp $
*/
#ifndef IPNETTOMEDIATABLE_H
#define IPNETTOMEDIA
Rajesh Gopalan wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using Net SNMP for all the management purposes in our project but
> there exists a stringent memory constraint. Net SNMP, by default, while
> installing installs the MIB text files under usr/local/share/snmp/mibs.
> Also, while starting it looks for all the MIB te
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:07:30AM -0400, Chris Nelson wrote:
> Is there such a thing? I'm embarking on an 802.1Q-2005 implementation
> and can't find any MIB text. Surely MSTP can be monitored and
> administered via SNMP. I even have an MSTP switch I'm going to test
> against and snmpwalk doesn