Re: hrStorage looses track of remounted file system (bug #1689551)

2010-03-05 Thread Leonardo Chiquitto
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Robert Story wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:29:56 -0200 Leonardo wrote: > LC> Dave, I'm interested in using a part of your work on the new filesystem > LC> MIB to fix the problem described in this bug. To avoid reinventing the > LC> wheel, do you think you can sen

read_objid() problem on Solaris build

2010-03-05 Thread Mike Walker
I've built net-snmp v5.5 for 64bit Windows and 64bit SPARC on Solaris 10. I perform the following test on both (Solaris and Windows) machines: snmpget -v 1 -c public 40.0.40.129 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 Which works fine. Using the same oid string as for the command line 'snmpget' I call the API functi

Processing invalid messages

2010-03-05 Thread Jan Safranek
Hi, I've stumbled upon snmpd processing malformed requests. How should snmplib react to it? E.g. my snmpd received get-request with ASN.1 error in Request ID - instead of Type: 2, Length: 1, Value: 0xc it received Type: 32, which is wrong. But the request got processed and answered, nothing ch

Re: About NET SNMP Agent...

2010-03-05 Thread Robert Story
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:11:51 +0530 (IST) ganeshyell...@bel.co.in wrote: GCI> After this, when i try to execute snmpget GCI> GCI> snmpget -v 2c -c public localhost sysDescr.0 GCI> GCI> I am getting the following error. GCI> GCI> SNMPv2-MIB::sysUpTime = No Such Instance currently exists GCI> GC

Re: TRAPS sent for excluded MIBS

2010-03-05 Thread Robert Story
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:44:32 +0530 Mayank wrote: MM> Thanks for the speedy response. It was a great help. MM> This means that it is not possible to restrict particular TRAPS from being MM> send by the agent or received by the server, using snmp views. MM> Plz correct if my understanding is wrong an

Re: Defining MIB

2010-03-05 Thread Fulko Hew
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Dave Shield wrote: > On 5 March 2010 13:42, Fulko Hew wrote: > > The closest merge to your original request would be the following > > > > > >abc OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { application 1 } > >xyz OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { application 2 }

Re: Defining MIB

2010-03-05 Thread Dave Shield
On 5 March 2010 13:42, Fulko Hew wrote: > The closest merge to your original request would be the following > > >        abc     OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=  {  application  1  } >        xyz     OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=  {  application  2  } > >        noOfMessages    OBJECT-TYPE >                SYNTAX  

Re: Defining MIB

2010-03-05 Thread Fulko Hew
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Prakash wrote: > > Thanks Dave, > > I have two mibs as below and I want to merge them into a single MIB. > According to your original definitions, > ABC-MIB := > >abc OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { application 1 } > ... snip ... > XYZ-MIB := > >

Re: Defining MIB

2010-03-05 Thread Dave Shield
On 5 March 2010 12:51, Prakash wrote: > I have two mibs as below and I want to merge them into a single MIB. > > ABC-MIB := > = > >        abc     OBJECT IDENTIFIER >                ::=  {  application  1  } > XYZ-MIB := >

RE: Defining MIB

2010-03-05 Thread Prakash
Thanks Dave, I have two mibs as below and I want to merge them into a single MIB. ABC-MIB := = . . abc OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { application 1 } noOfMessagesOB