could someone tell me how can I generate and send a trap as a result of an
extenal triggering event ?
Should I write a simple c program to poll for an event and generate/send trap
to a manager ? OR I use snmptrap.will an independent program be able to
generate trap by all itself ?
thanks
Hello.
Assume that we have a configure option, --disable-foo, with the effect
of setting the symbol NETSNMP_DISABLE_FOO.
Further assume that the foo routines are part of snmplib.
Which version of disabling is the better one:
A)
---foo.h---
extern void foo();
---foo.c---
#ifdef NETSNMP_DISABLE_
On 24 March 2010 13:14, Robert Story wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:54:15 +0100 Jan wrote:
> JS> > What is the intended interpretation of these three return values?
> JS> >
> JS> > -1 seems to indicate an invalid or unrecognised option value
> JS> > -2 seems to indicate that processing ha
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:54:15 +0100 Jan wrote:
JS> > What is the intended interpretation of these three return values?
JS> >
JS> >-1 seems to indicate an invalid or unrecognised option value
JS> >-2 seems to indicate that processing has been completed
JS> >
JS> > What is the distinctive ci
On 03/24/2010 01:50 PM, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 24 March 2010 11:10, Jan Safranek wrote:
>> In trunk I've made following change to fix a bug:
>>
>> It adds new negative return value to netsnmp_parse_args and
>> snmp_parse_args, which should be handled by callers (=applications).
>
> What is the in
On 24 March 2010 11:10, Jan Safranek wrote:
> In trunk I've made following change to fix a bug:
>
> It adds new negative return value to netsnmp_parse_args and
> snmp_parse_args, which should be handled by callers (=applications).
What is the intended interpretation of these three return values?
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:10:44 +0100 Jan wrote:
JS> It adds new negative return value to netsnmp_parse_args and
JS> snmp_parse_args, which should be handled by callers (=applications).
JS> I've of course changed our applications in apps/ directory.
JS>
JS> My question is, if it's allowed to put th
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:02:52 +0530 (IST) madanagopal wrote:
M>I came to know of a problem in Net-SNMP where if there is a SET request
M> outstanding in the agent, it will not process any other request (even
M> though the new request is a GET request for a different OID). Is the
M> problem co
In trunk I've made following change to fix a bug:
On 03/24/2010 11:47 AM, jsafra...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Revision: 18358
>http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=18358&view=rev
> Author: jsafranek
> Date: 2010-03-24 10:47:21 + (Wed, 24 Mar 2010)
>
> Log Me
On 03/22/2010 04:54 PM, Dave Shield wrote:
> 1) Latch disk statistics (disk-latch.patch)
+1 both
> 2) Missing privKey crash (des-priv.patch)
+1 both
> 3) VACM best match(vacm-best-match.patch)
0
> 4) MIB dir path logging (mibdir-log.patch)
0
Jan
---
Hi,
I came to know of a problem in Net-SNMP where if there is a SET request
outstanding in the agent, it will not process any other request (even
though the new request is a GET request for a different OID). Is the
problem correct? Is the problem still there? When is it likely to be solved?
On 23 March 2010 19:53, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> The patch below changes the AgentX over TCP behavior into:
>
> snmpd -x tcp: listens to localhost:705
> agentxtrap -x tcp: connects to localhost:705
>
> Since the 5.4 branch is currently in release-candidate freeze mode,
> this patch has to be voted
On 23 March 2010 17:12, Guna S wrote:
> Our snmp suddenly stopped responding on linux box
Is the agent still running?
What does
ps -ef | grep snmpd
report?
Is there anything in the logs?
What happens if you try to restart the agent?
Note that the 5.1.x line is no longer supporte
Hi,
I need a help from you pls... Our snmp suddenly stopped responding on linux
box and when i try to run snmpwalk command on host I'm getting "Timeout: No
Response from localhost" message. I just did strace snmpwalk and below is
the snipped output. if you can give me any clue that would be helpfu
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 15:54 +, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 21 March 2010 08:45, Dave Shield wrote:
> > On 20 March 2010 15:13, Robert Story wrote:
> >> Dave, have any other issues come up that might warrant a rc2?
> >
> > I've got a list of three or four possible patches sitting on my desk at
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
