Re: Which is the stable version of Net -SNMP?

2010-12-02 Thread Princy Gift
Hi Abraham From the page, I was not able to figure out which is the recommended version of Net-SNMP. Do you mean to that the versions available for download in that page are more stable? When I mean stable version I refer to a release with less number of issues which may require immediate c

Re: Which is the stable version of Net -SNMP?

2010-12-02 Thread Abraham Varricatt
> > > Can you please let me know the stable version of Net-SNMP? > > Please, pray tell WHAT is so difficult with the layout of this webpage, http://www.net-snmp.org/download.html Or, how do you define a 'stable' release ? -Abraham V. --

Which is the stable version of Net -SNMP?

2010-12-02 Thread Princy Gift
Hi, Can you please let me know the stable version of Net-SNMP? Thanks, Princy -- Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500! Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game b

Re: snmptrapd does not log snmpv3 traps?

2010-12-02 Thread Claus Klein
On 16.11.2010, at 10:12, Dave Shield wrote: > > The pragmatic situation is that both sides of the connection need to > be using the *same* engineID, but it doesn't really matter what that > engineID actually is. > So one common approach is to create user(s) in the snmptrapd.conf > file with an e

RE: non-caching scheme question...

2010-12-02 Thread Judith Walker
This was very helpful, Robert. Thanks. The READMEs and your FAQs are of great help also. Judy -Original Message- From: Robert Story [mailto:rst...@freesnmp.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 8:46 PM To: Judith Walker Cc: net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: non-cach

Re: 5.6.1.pre1 released for testing

2010-12-02 Thread Bill Fenner
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Wes Hardaker wrote: > We've released Net-SNMP 5.6.1.pre1 which contains bug fixes over the 5.6 > release.  Please give it a whirl and let us know how it works for you! My TCP-MIB regression test passes now, the bug described in patch 3085295 is gone. This is, of c

Re: tunnel mib

2010-12-02 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 07:02 +0100, Niels Baggesen wrote: > Den 02-12-2010 04:39, Robert Story skrev: > > MF> So the result of this is that the tunnel mib is unsupported on linux, > > MF> *bsd, solaris and darwin* nowadays. > > > > :-( > > It DOES compile in my standard setup, which is CentOS and

Re: CFV: Trunk and V5-6 fails to build without openssl

2010-12-02 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Niels Baggesen wrote: > Den 01-12-2010 02:29, Wes Hardaker skrev: > >> On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:41:37 +0100, Magnus Fromreide< > ma...@lysator.liu.se> said: > > > > MF> Ok for trunk and V5-6? > > > > Applied for you :-) > > So, now it fails linking because of a