On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 21:27 -0800, sujata patra wrote:
> While shutting down it is trying to save some data. I am running my
> agent as master-agent as non-root. As the permission is not there it
> shows the bewlo informations.
>
> Creating directory: /var/net-snmp
> Failed to create the persisten
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 10:14 +0530, Ravi Kumar Kodam wrote:
> Dear Sir/Madam
>
> when iam issuing the snmpget command through code it is printing the result.
> But i want to return the value to some function.
> See the following code it is just printing but i want to hold the result
> value. the pr
It tries to save the non-volatile rows and also some smp engine related
properties.
The snmp engine properties ( e.g snmpEngineID and snmpEngineBoots) is
required for synchronization between
agent and manager( RFC 3414 - section 2.3).
You can stop it by not calling function snmp_store , but i am
While shutting down it is trying to save some data. I am running my agent as
master-agent as non-root. As the permission is not there it shows the bewlo
informations.
Creating directory: /var/net-snmp
Failed to create the persistent directory for /var/net-snmp/xxx.conf
read_config_store open fai
Dear Sir/Madam
when iam issuing the snmpget command through code it is printing the result.
But i want to return the value to some function.
See the following code it is just printing but i want to hold the result
value. the print_variable function is just printing the output to the stdout.
but i
Hello Dave,
first of all thank you very much for your detailed answer.
>When you talk about "leaf handlers", do you mean the handlers for scalar
> objects, or the handlers for column objects within a table
Im just using scalar objects.
> What sort of registration call(s) are you using?
netsnm
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 12:03 +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Magnus Fromreide
> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 21:10 +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Magnus Fromreide
> > wrote:
> > Hello.
>
On 1 March 2011 13:04, Reto Jaeger wrote:
> I have implemented an snmp subagent using the agent-x protocol.
> When I do a snmpwalk operation I see that all leaf handlers are called
> twice. The leaf handlers are called once (as expected) when I performing
> a snmpget operation.
When you talk abou
On 2 March 2011 17:38, Reto Jaeger wrote:
> > What sort of registration call(s) are you using?
>
> netsnmp_register_scalar(...)
In which case, the routine handle_callState() should only be called once
for each request.
If you're seeing it invoked twice, then my suspicion is that the agent
is rec
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 17:08 +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Wes Hardaker
> > wrote:
>
> >
> > Today I found out that even if the usm security model has been enabled
> > that the snmpusm binary does not g
Respected sir,
I am developing snmp agent, i want to post snmp related issues on this site.
my mail id : atulbabancha...@bel.co.in
please allow me to post.
Thank You.
Confidentiality Notice
The information contained in this electronic message and any
attachments to this message are intended f
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 21:10 +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Magnus Fromreide
> > wrote:
> > Hello.
>
> >
> > One could make the functions return 1 on success on 0 on
> > failure,
Hi,
I have implemented an snmp subagent using the agent-x protocol.
When I do a snmpwalk operation I see that all leaf handlers are called
twice.
The leaf handlers are called once (as expected) when I performing a
snmpget operation.
My question is: Why the leaf handlers called twice on a snmpwa
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 21:10 +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Magnus Fromreide
> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> One could make the functions return 1 on success on 0 on
> failure, but that is a bigger ABI change.
Bah, I misread the code. This
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 17:08 +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Wes Hardaker
> wrote:
>
> Today I found out that even if the usm security model has been enabled
> that the snmpusm binary does not get built. The result is that "make
> test" prints the following output
15 matches
Mail list logo