Re: massive feature/minimalist patch being checked in right now

2011-03-04 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 19:55:10 +0100, Magnus Fromreide > said: >> I think that was fixed recently too (by you) MF> Yes. I got no answers :-) Yeah, sorry... as I said: I had to disappear for a few days. -- Wes Hardaker Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net -

Re: massive feature/minimalist patch being checked in right now

2011-03-04 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 10:17:26AM -0800, Wes Hardaker wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 23:34:37 +0100, Magnus Fromreide > > said: > > MF> At the moment the following, fairly basic, configuration fails for me: > > MF> /path/to/net-snmp/configure --with-defaults --enable-minimalist > > I

Re: real time neighbour table updates

2011-03-04 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 07:54:10 +0200, Timo Teräs said: TT> What's the usual time frame for getting patches reviewed and committed? TT> Could someone take a look at this? It's actually on my todo list to go review the patches. They're always reviewed before the next release, and I (and other

Re: massive feature/minimalist patch being checked in right now

2011-03-04 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:55:01 +0100, Magnus Fromreide > said: MF> I suppose I am still confused by all this so could you please explain MF> what the relations model? Sorry for the delay. I took a trip north for work and was away from mail for a few days. MF> The third one is somewhat

Re: massive feature/minimalist patch being checked in right now

2011-03-04 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 23:34:37 +0100, Magnus Fromreide > said: MF> At the moment the following, fairly basic, configuration fails for me: MF> /path/to/net-snmp/configure --with-defaults --enable-minimalist I think that was fixed recently too (by you) -- Wes Hardaker Please mail all re

Re: snmp_increment_statistic{_by}

2011-03-04 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 21:58:37 +0100, Magnus Fromreide > said: MF> I have been thinking of an netsnmp_returns_1() that could be used for MF> situations like this one, but that is just plain ugly. It's an ugly problem. And I'm sorry to have been the one that created it :-) - We can't d

Re: mibgroup/disman/nslookup should be omitted, not made read-only, for NETSNMP_NO_WRITE_SUPPORT

2011-03-04 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 15:53:43 -0500, Bill Fenner said: BF> I see disman/nslookup was updated recently to make lookupCtlTable BF> read-only for NETSNMP_NO_WRITE_SUPPORT. This seems odd, since the BF> only way to use this MIB is to write rows into the lookupCtlTable. If BF> there's a provisio

Re: when the agent has been from multiple hosts,

2011-03-04 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 20:26 -0800, sujata patra wrote: > From: Magnus Fromreide > Re: when the agent has been from multiple hosts, > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 08:17:49AM -0800, sujata patra wrote: > > > > Can you please tell me what will to 3 sets of data ? How can I > > differentiate them ?