Re: CFV OID Ways Forward (was Re: Oid Type rationalization in 5.6.1)

2011-05-11 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Wed, 11 May 2011 10:56:58 -0400, Doug Manley > said: DM> If we take a page from POSIX's book, we could typedef everything to be DM> magical net-snmp types so that the underlying implementation is not DM> important as long as everyone recompiles his code when a new version DM> comes

Re: CFV OID Ways Forward (was Re: Oid Type rationalization in 5.6.1)

2011-05-11 Thread Doug Manley
I agree that while "most" implementations will treat "int" and such the way that we generally expect, there is no reason *not* to use the exact measures provided by , *especially* when the code must match specifications. The whole world expects RequestID to be 32-bit (by way of example); why shoul

Re: not installed via "make install"?

2011-05-11 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Wed, 11 May 2011 07:24:23 +0200, Niels Baggesen > said: >> What can't compile outside the source tree? NB> I would guess most everything :-( Ohh... I forgot it was included from one header file... Anyway, it's installed as of yesterday. I need to install some other files too wh