On Jun 10, 2011, at 9:10 AM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:55:20 -0400, Jeff Johnson said:
>
> JJ> And net-snmp has a patch to avoid being trapped by RPM PI
> JJ> incompatibilities for many years now. See the archives (and I think
> JJ> the patch is still in Gentoo).
>
> Hm
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:55:20 -0400, Jeff Johnson said:
JJ> And net-snmp has a patch to avoid being trapped by RPM PI
JJ> incompatibilities for many years now. See the archives (and I think
JJ> the patch is still in Gentoo).
Hmm... we'll have to go searching for it.
[it's not in the patch
On Jun 10, 2011, at 12:38 AM, Niels Baggesen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 05:27:26AM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote:
>> It's time to wrap up the 'pre' series (bug-fixing) for 5.7 and try and
>> get it out the door. I'd like to do an rc1 release either today or
>> tomorrow if no one has reasons we
On 9 June 2011 16:14, Mygapula, Sudheer IN BLR SISL
wrote:
> The issue can not be fixed from devices , so I am looking for work around
> from manager side.
The only workaround that comes to mind would be to craft your management
application in such a way that it invokes a separate sub-process fo
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:09:18PM +, Sunil Galam wrote:
> after running make test, two tests failed. please advise.
> complete session output is attached for reference.
What does it say in the log files from the tests?
/tmp/snmp-test-T070com2sec_simple-14922/snmpd.log
and
/tmp/snmp-test-T200
