Is it ok to customize netsnmp library according to my requirements ?
Any restrictions\complince are applicable to change the source code.
-Original Message-
From: dave.shi...@googlemail.com [mailto:dave.shi...@googlemail.com] On Behalf
Of Dave Shield
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 4:00 PM
Type of snmp_enableauthentraps variable is changed from int to long.
This fixes the bug with writing to snmpEnableAuthenTraps if server is
compiled for 64bit (snmpset reports wrong length). This bug was
introduced a long time ago (by faeecd0 commit).
Actually this is a 'less effort' type of fix bu
> On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 08:40:54 +0200, "Giuseppe Modugno"
> said:
GM> Is net-snmp 5.5.0 the last binaries release for Windows?
GM> Do you have any plan to create an updated binaries release in the
GM> future?
We do have someone that is hopefully going to be producing windows
binaries in
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 12:03:21 -0700, Garrett Cooper
> said:
GC> But if you guys can't test obsolete OSes, then what's the value of
GC> backwards compatibility -- especially when OS distributions like
GC> FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD openly deprecate versions of their OS
GC> within a few
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 13:02:44 -0400, Robert Story
> said:
RS> Our esteemed leader takes a fairly hard-line stance on backwards
RS> compatibility, so it's unlikely that anything will be dropped.
Hey! It's a *group* decision (that we routinely come back to and make
the same decisions abo
