Re: Fix for FreeBSD9 with 5.5.2rc1

2012-05-14 Thread Niels Baggesen
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:53:39PM -0400, Robert Story wrote: > NB> #include > NB> #include "hrSWRunPerfTable.h" > NB> +#include "data_access/swrun.h" > > My question is why isn't #include picking up > swrun.h? Do we really need both includes? They way the contents is organized, yes. But I di

Re: Fix for FreeBSD (and hopefully AIX) in 5.6.2rc1

2012-05-14 Thread Niels Baggesen
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:58:03PM -0400, Robert Story wrote: > Why are you removing the HAVE_STRUCT_MSGHDR_MSG_* tests? Having IP_SENDSRCADDR/IP_RECVDSTADDR without those structs does not make sense at all - and it works fine without them. /Niels -- Niels Baggesen - @home - Århus - Denmark - n

Problem with compiling mib objects with subagent

2012-05-14 Thread Jasti Durgashree
Whenever I restart or shutdown my system all my configurations like compiling mib objects with subagent are erased...am not getting where the problem occurred pls can anyone help regarding this? -- Live Security Virtual Con

Integration of net snmp with developed application

2012-05-14 Thread Jasti Durgashree
Hi, Can anyone please tell me how to integrate snmp with developed application -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed an

Re: Fix for FreeBSD (and hopefully AIX) in 5.6.2rc1

2012-05-14 Thread Robert Story
On Sun, 13 May 2012 20:37:57 +0200 Niels wrote: NB> -#if (defined(linux) && defined(IP_PKTINFO)) \ NB> -|| defined(IP_RECVDSTADDR) && HAVE_STRUCT_MSGHDR_MSG_CONTROL \ NB> - && HAVE_STRUCT_MSGHDR_MSG_FLAGS NB> -#if defined(linux) && defined(IP_PKTINFO) NB> -#elif d

Re: Fix for FreeBSD9 with 5.5.2rc1

2012-05-14 Thread Robert Story
On Sun, 13 May 2012 20:45:15 +0200 Niels wrote: NB> --- a/agent/mibgroup/host/hrSWRunPerfTable.c NB> +++ b/agent/mibgroup/host/hrSWRunPerfTable.c NB> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ NB> #include NB> #include NB> #include "hrSWRunPerfTable.h" NB> +#include "data_access/swrun.h" My question is why isn't #inc

Re: Change in header of Net-SNMP

2012-05-14 Thread Robert Story
On Mon, 14 May 2012 15:03:37 +0530 Jovin wrote: JVK> Hi all JVK> I have been using Net-SNMP 5.4.2.1 previously. JVK> There, the header of the trap used to be in the below format JVK> receivedfrom UDP: [RECEIVER IP]->[DEVICE IP]:-25520 JVK> JVK> Now I have upgraded Net-SNMP to 5.7.1. JVK> Now the

Re: Fix for FreeBSD9 with 5.5.2rc1

2012-05-14 Thread Niels Baggesen
Den 13-05-2012 21:53, Magnus Fromreide skrev: > Please separate it into two patches (chunk 1 vs. chunk 2 and 3) as they > seems to be unrelated. You are quite right. Part 1 should not have been part of this patch. /Niels -- Niels Baggesen - @home - Århus - Denmark - [email protected] T

[no subject]

2012-05-14 Thread Michael Smith
http://wiltoninsider.com/drupal/sites/default/cvlr.php?rgs=glyo.ryo&dd=rd.vgvs&dj=groj-- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and h

(no subject)

2012-05-14 Thread down Load
Turn your computer into making money machine. http://crouic5webserver.com/httpszgexzqo2.php?ufjfriend=564 _ But Jim was dead against it at first. brighton wilson Mon, 14 May 2012 11:58:55 -- Liv

Change in header of Net-SNMP

2012-05-14 Thread Jovin Vasanth Kumar
Hi all I have been using Net-SNMP 5.4.2.1 previously. There, the header of the trap used to be in the below format receivedfrom UDP: [RECEIVER IP]->[DEVICE IP]:-25520 Now I have upgraded Net-SNMP to 5.7.1. Now the header of the trap is in the format receivedfrom UDP: [DEVICE IP]:44754->[RECEIVER