IMO we need to revert this patch, as it would cause issues in production.
This is a partial fix.
-Feroz
On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 2:35 PM Vivek Aditya wrote:
> Thanks for quick response
>
> I am working on this feature and able to achieve partial success. There is
> one use case where
snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
>
--
Regards,
Feroz Ahmed
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
Hi,
On net-snmp 5.8, with the following configuration in snmpd.conf file, which
version of *SHA *(i.e SHA1/SHA-192/SHA-256/SHA-284/SHA-512) is used?
createUser feroz *SHA *feroz123 AES feroz123
rwuser feroz priv
--
Regards,
Feroz Ahmed
___
Net-snmp
> Net-snmp-coders mailing list
> Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
>
--
Regards,
Feroz Ahmed
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
lies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
>
>
> ___
> Net-snmp-coders mailing list
> Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
>
--
Regards,
Feroz Ahmed
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
the agent side) is to speed
> up the loading. Either just plain faster, or caching the loaded information
> somehow, so that the reply can be triggered directly, without loading for t
> time-units. Then refresh the information periodically, so that the returned
> information is as 'stal
container_load function
returns the data in 2sec, we still have another 4 seconds.
We should have got the response in the 3rd to 5th retry.
If I increase the timeout value in snmpwalk command with "-t 3", it works
fine.
--
Regards,
Feroz Ahmed
___
Net-s
rted\n"));
return MFD_NOT_VALID_EVER;
}
If I remove the above block from the generated Code, will I be able to
perform CreateAndWait?
--
Regards,
Feroz Ahmed
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.
.1.2.1.1.3.0): 16516*
*SNMPv2-MIB::snmpTrapOID.0 (1.3.6.1.6.3.1.1.4.1.0):
1.3.6.1.4.1.x.4.1.1.3.11.5.0.1*
ABCD-MIB::arubaWiredFanName
(1.3.6.1.4.1.x.4.1.1.3.11.5.1.1.4): DATA_1
ABCD-MIB::arubaWiredFanState
(1.3.6.1.4.1.x.4.1.1.3.11.5.1.1.5): DATA_2
--
t.c*
if (op != NETSNMP_CALLBACK_OP_RECEIVED_MESSAGE) {
return 1;
}
+ if (!IS_AGENTX_VERSION(pdu->version) && subagent_connected == FALSE) {
+ return 1;
+ }
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 11:37 AM Feroz wrote:
> For my testing I added "proxy -v2c -c public ud
ri, Sep 3, 2021 at 3:43 AM Feroz wrote:
>
>> My question is, is there a way to block an agent from responding to
>> queries ( by timeout), till time the sub-agent connects to the agent.
>>
>
> No, the master agent always lives under the impression that it knows
> everyt
Hi Bill,
I have only one sub-agent running on the same box.
Let me test by adding the proxy configuration in snmpd.conf that you shared.
i.e:
"proxy udp:127.0.0.1:9 .1.3"
Thanks a lot for your response.
-Feroz
On Wed, 8 Sep, 2021, 11:47 pm Bill Fenner, wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 20
:sysObjectID.0 = OID: SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises..4.1.1.1.100
My question is, is there a way to block an agent from responding to
queries ( by timeout), till time the sub-agent connects to the agent.
--
Regards,
Feroz Ahmed
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing
I tried as follows, serverRecvBuf and serverSendBuf worked, but
timeout/retries didn't work.
[snmp] timeout 10
[snmp] retries 60
[snmp] serverRecvBuf 425984
[snmp] serverSendBuf 425984
Moreover, I see the value of Recv/Send Buf is getting doubled in "ss
-lumpna" output.
-Fer
hi,
Is it possible for snmptrapd to buffer/queue the TRAP's and INFORM's and
perform retry in case of failure to forward them to the destination?
I see "serverRecvBuf", "serverSendBuf","retries" but they don't seem to
work, when used in
Do the patch mentioned for CVE-2019-20892 in the link below, will fix this
double free crash?
Is it safe to appy this patch?
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-20892
-Feroz
On Fri, 5 Mar, 2021, 2:01 am chandrasekharreddy c, <
chandrasekharre...@hotmail.com> wrote:
tu3323:~# cat /tmp/snmptrapd.conf
authCommunity log,net public
snmpTrapdAddr udp:162,udp6:162
forward default 2.2.2.2:162
createUser feroz SHA feroz123 DES feroz123
authUser log,net feroz priv
root@Ubuntu3323:~#
root@Ubuntu3323:~#
root@Ubuntu3323:~# ifconfig eth1
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
17 matches
Mail list logo
