Re: net-snmp 5.3.3.pre1 available

2009-02-05 Thread Larry Dickson
There is something wrong either with your summary or with some emailer - I get partial lines like "- Corrected registering of" and "- Applying patch from Magnus Fromreide to fix the". Larry Dickson Cutting Edge Networked Storage On 2/4/09, Robert Story wrote: > > This

Re: Solaris 10's Net-SNMP requires Unix Domain Sockets

2008-07-29 Thread Larry Dickson
s is related to your problem but it could be. Larry Dickson Cutting Edge Networked Storage On 7/28/08, Sinha, Birendra (Birendra) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > Please see the mail thread below, Mike suggetions didn't solve my > problem. > > I am

Re: Agentx communication issues with net-snmp 5.4.1

2008-05-15 Thread Larry Dickson
Hi Latha, We had a similar problem going from 5.2.1 to 5.4.1 that was discussed on this list around April 18. The key fix was to make sure the NetSNMP::OID call comes AFTER the NetSNMP::agent call. The ordering did not use to matter but now it does. Larry Dickson Cutting Edge Networked Storage

Re: 5.4.1 won't talk

2008-04-18 Thread Larry Dickson
/18/08, Larry Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > PROGRESS! ... > > There is an error in your "pass.pm" file, line 56. Instead of > > @inputs = (); > > it should have > > @inputs = @ARGV; > > because the way it is it never sees anything. After f

Re: 5.4.1 won't talk

2008-04-18 Thread Larry Dickson
ion - even with your snmpd.conf file. Larry On 4/18/08, Larry Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm assuming that being root means you have permissions for everything. > But it does not seem to work. > > I ran your snmpd.conf with the following changes: (1) replaced y

Re: 5.4.1 won't talk

2008-04-18 Thread Larry Dickson
ulik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Apr 18, 2008, at 6:05 PM, Larry Dickson wrote: > > Thank you, Dw. I will see if it works. I notice that embedded perl and > > subagent are treated as mutually exclusive, so I will strip out the embedded > > perl line from the s

Re: 5.4.1 won't talk

2008-04-18 Thread Larry Dickson
says /var/agentx/master was the default; I could never get a socket in 5.4.1 until I added an explicit agentXSocket line to snmpd.conf. Larry On 4/18/08, Dirk-Willem van Gulik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Apr 18, 2008, at 4:25 PM, Larry Dickson wrote: > > Thanks, Thom

Re: 5.4.1 won't talk

2008-04-18 Thread Larry Dickson
n 4/17/08, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Larry Dickson schrieb: > > Going on, I discovered man/snmpd.examples.5 suggested putting single > > quotes (?) around do *.pl in the "perl do" line, and doing that made > > Bareword go away, but still does n

Re: 5.4.1 won't talk

2008-04-17 Thread Larry Dickson
ent). If anyone knows of a subagent that works in 5.4.1 it might help. Larry On 4/17/08, Larry Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Actually it was adding the agentXSocket directive that got me that far. > Before, it just shot itself in the head. Now at least it stays alive along &

Re: 5.4.1 won't talk

2008-04-17 Thread Larry Dickson
On 4/17/08, Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On ons, 2008-04-16 at 10:35 -0700, Larry Dickson wrote: > > > :: > > snmpd.conf-old > > :: > > #version 1 > > rocommunity public > > rwcommunity private > &

Re: 5.4.1 won't talk

2008-04-16 Thread Larry Dickson
ere in the codebase surely it must trigger a communication, presumably across the socket "master", to tell the agent it exists? Larry On 4/16/08, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 16/04/2008, Larry Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > the n

Re: 5.4.1 won't talk

2008-04-16 Thread Larry Dickson
uot; if ($DEBUG); $agent->register( 'myname', $regoid, \&my_snmp_handler ); print STDERR "AFTER registration at $regoid\n" if ($DEBUG); if ($subagent) { my $firstrun = 1; print STDERR "Yes I am a subagent approaching running loop.\n" if ($DEBUG); # We ne

Re: 5.4.1 won't talk

2008-04-16 Thread Larry Dickson
subtree when I do a "getnext". But I expect I can turn on DEBUG in the subagent and track it down. If not, I'll get back to you... Thanks, Larry On 4/16/08, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 15/04/2008, Larry Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

5.4.1 won't talk

2008-04-15 Thread Larry Dickson
Hi all, Our path from net-snmp 5.2.1 to 5.4.1 has been blocked for months because the latter refuses to talk to our subagent. It worked fine in 5.2.1; we could even do a full walk through our MIB. Has anyone run across a problem like this? Following are some collected notes. TIA, Larry The new /

Re: cpu idle is 0%

2008-03-27 Thread Larry Dickson
TECTED]> wrote: > > Hi! Larry Dickson > > Thank you very much for kind reply. > > I don't understand what you're trying to say and > what do you mean by select is failing?. > >

Re: cpu idle is 0%

2008-03-26 Thread Larry Dickson
Have you checked whether a select is failing somewhere? It can generate a tight loop with such full CPU utilization. I remember this from a non-SNMP project, but select is used everywhere. Larry Dickson On 3/25/08, Siva Prakash Reddy G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi! > >

Re: GETNEXT stumbles at end of some subtrees

2008-02-12 Thread Larry Dickson
On 2/12/08, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/02/2008, Larry Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I inserted ### before the "perl do" line in each copy of snmpd.conf that > had > > it. > > And restarted the agent, I presume? Yes,

Re: GETNEXT stumbles at end of some subtrees

2008-02-11 Thread Larry Dickson
Connection from before it jumps to our private subtree; this does not appear except when I jump out of netSnmp subtree; but I do not believe that behavior has changed either. Thanks, Larry Dickson On 2/11/08, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/02/2008, Larry Dickson <

Re: GETNEXT stumbles at end of some subtrees

2008-02-11 Thread Larry Dickson
307 engineBoots 211 oldEngineID 0x80001f88803fa6fa6b0f778f47 === Contents of (recently created) /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf #version 1 trapsink 192.168.1.122 rocommunity public rwcommunity private syscontact Larry Dickson syslocation Cutting Edge master agentx perl do /etc/edgeware-subagent.pl

Re: GETNEXT stumbles at end of some subtrees

2008-02-11 Thread Larry Dickson
Interleaved below... On 2/11/08, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/02/2008, Larry Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Response to getnext at netSnmp.1.3 is timeout. > > OK - what about >GETNEXT netSnmp.1.5 >GETNEXT netSnmp.1.7 >

Re: GETNEXT stumbles at end of some subtrees

2008-02-11 Thread Larry Dickson
. But my question is also more algorithmic: How is it (the agent/subagent combination) supposed to do a getnext that jumps out of the subagent's subtree? Larry Dickson On 2/11/08, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 23/01/2008, Larry Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

GETNEXT stumbles at end of some subtrees

2008-01-23 Thread Larry Dickson
Hi all, I'm new at this and using a variant of version 5.2.1 (ca 2005-05-26). I'm using iReasoning mib browser and/or snmpwalk and friends. Attempts to do getnext at end of a subtree get inconsistent results. In the MIB files, ucdavis = .1.3.6.1.4.1.2021 and netSnmp=.1.3.6.1.4.1.8072 - and given t