strlcpy() implementations typically scan for the end of the source argument
passed to strlcpy(). Hence avoid passing an unterminated string to strlcpy().
Reported-by: Stuart Henderson
Fixes: 7f05daa8e0e0 ("CHANGES: BUG: 3444939: BUG: 1796886: snmplib: Avoid that
sprint_realloc_octet_string() emb
On 2018/05/19 14:07, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> strlcpy() implementations typically scan for the end of the source argument
> passed to strlcpy(). Hence avoid passing an unterminated string to strlcpy().
>
> Reported-by: Stuart Henderson
> Fixes: 7f05daa8e0e0 ("CHANGES: BUG: 3444939: BUG: 1796886:
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 02:07:56PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> strlcpy() implementations typically scan for the end of the source argument
> passed to strlcpy(). Hence avoid passing an unterminated string to strlcpy().
>
> Reported-by: Stuart Henderson
> Fixes: 7f05daa8e0e0 ("CHANGES: BUG: 34
On 05/19/18 15:14, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 02:07:56PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
strlcpy() implementations typically scan for the end of the source argument
passed to strlcpy(). Hence avoid passing an unterminated string to strlcpy().
Reported-by: Stuart Henderson
Fi
On Sat, 19 May 2018 14:07:56 -0700 Bart wrote:
BVA> strlcpy() implementations typically scan for the end of the
BVA> source argument passed to strlcpy(). Hence avoid passing an
BVA> unterminated string to strlcpy().
I'm going to say -1, but for the patch and not the need to fix the
issue.
This co
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 05:28:31PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 05/19/18 15:14, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> > On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 02:07:56PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > strlcpy() implementations typically scan for the end of the source
> > > argument
> > > passed to strlcpy(). Henc
On 05/19/18 21:18, Robert Story wrote:
On Sat, 19 May 2018 14:07:56 -0700 Bart wrote:
BVA> strlcpy() implementations typically scan for the end of the
BVA> source argument passed to strlcpy(). Hence avoid passing an
BVA> unterminated string to strlcpy().
I'm going to say -1, but for the patch an
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 12:18 AM, Robert Story wrote:
> On Sat, 19 May 2018 14:07:56 -0700 Bart wrote:
> BVA> strlcpy() implementations typically scan for the end of the
> BVA> source argument passed to strlcpy(). Hence avoid passing an
> BVA> unterminated string to strlcpy().
>
> I'm going to sa
On Sun, 20 May 2018 13:06:43 -0400 Bill wrote:
BF> I do not think that now is the time to try to deal with any of
BF> the fundamentals, but just not regress from previous released
BF> behavior, and deal with the underlying issue in 5.8.1 / 5.7.4.
Just to clarify, do you mean
a) accepts Bart's RF
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Robert Story wrote:
> On Sun, 20 May 2018 13:06:43 -0400 Bill wrote:
> BF> I do not think that now is the time to try to deal with any of
> BF> the fundamentals, but just not regress from previous released
> BF> behavior, and deal with the underlying issue in 5.8.
Bill Fenner writes:
> So, +1 on committing Bart's patch, because it accomplishes the goal of
> fixing the regression, with the caveat that I really think that this
> whole area needs to be revisited.
I think this comment is spot on. So I'd accept the patch too, though my
gut reaction is to reve
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:18 AM, Wes Hardaker <
harda...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Bill Fenner writes:
>
> > So, +1 on committing Bart's patch, because it accomplishes the goal of
> > fixing the regression, with the caveat that I really think that this
> > whole area needs to be revisited.
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 02:36:43PM -0400, Bill Fenner wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:18 AM, Wes Hardaker <
> harda...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> > Bill Fenner writes:
> >
> > > So, +1 on committing Bart's patch, because it accomplishes the goal of
> > > fixing the regression, with the
13 matches
Mail list logo