Re: 64-bit windows and winExtDLL

2013-01-05 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 03/20/12 20:51, Fulko Hew wrote: > So given that procedure, I have followed a more systematic > approach to my testing: > > OpenSSL SDK IPv6 winExtDll5.6.15.7.1arch > --- --- --- >xx x works

Re: 64-bit windows and winExtDLL

2012-03-22 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 03/21/12 13:46, Fulko Hew wrote: > I'll try asking our IT dept if they can 'allow' it, I know I can't do > it myself. > But what would firewall and anti-virus do to prevent a DLL from loading > or being loadable? ;-\ Many anti-virus and firewall software packages use a technique called DLL inj

Re: 64-bit windows and winExtDLL

2012-03-21 Thread Fulko Hew
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 03/20/12 19:51, Fulko Hew wrote: > > I did not test x86 with an x86build of openSLL, because the issue now > > seems > > to simply be winExtDll/Microsoft DLLs/Windows 7. > > > > I wish I had an older (pre Win 7) box to try to build on.

Re: 64-bit windows and winExtDLL

2012-03-20 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 03/20/12 19:51, Fulko Hew wrote: > I did not test x86 with an x86build of openSLL, because the issue now > seems > to simply be winExtDll/Microsoft DLLs/Windows 7. > > I wish I had an older (pre Win 7) box to try to build on. > > Do any of these test results suggest anything? All tests I ran we

Re: 64-bit windows and winExtDLL

2012-03-20 Thread Fulko Hew
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 03/20/12 13:30, Fulko Hew wrote: > > In the mean time, I thought I'd drop back (disable winExtDLL) and > > enable/build-with openSSL > > support. I downloaded openSSL 1.0.1 built it and installed it where I > > think it belongs > > as

Re: 64-bit windows and winExtDLL

2012-03-20 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 03/20/12 13:30, Fulko Hew wrote: > In the mean time, I thought I'd drop back (disable winExtDLL) and > enable/build-with openSSL > support. I downloaded openSSL 1.0.1 built it and installed it where I > think it belongs > as per README.win32 (and my interpretation of VS10 directories). I haven

Re: 64-bit windows and winExtDLL

2012-03-20 Thread Fulko Hew
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 03/19/12 18:35, Fulko Hew wrote: > > > ... So I thought I'd compile with vcvarsall.bat x86 (expecting to see > > the 'other' 3 DLLs fail to load). > > Now I see (when using snmp -DALL) that snmpd sees only _5_ DLLs to load > > (it omitt

Re: 64-bit windows and winExtDLL

2012-03-19 Thread Dave Shield
On 19 March 2012 18:50, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Unfortunately the installer of the most recent Net-SNMP Windows binaries > contains some code that prevents the 32-bit binaries to be installed on > a 64-bit Windows system. Can you expand on that, please Bart? Although I've produced a couple of t

Re: 64-bit windows and winExtDLL

2012-03-19 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 03/19/12 18:35, Fulko Hew wrote: > (Note: regardless of whether I run' vcvars32.bat x86' or choose 'x64', > the cl.exe command lines always show '/D "WIN32"' being used.) That's expected. A quote from http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/b0084kay.aspx: *_WIN32 - *Defined for applications fo

Re: 64-bit windows and winExtDLL

2012-03-19 Thread Fulko Hew
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 03/19/12 16:16, Fulko Hew wrote: > > C:\usr\bin>snmpd > > > -I-udp,udpTable,tcp,tcpTable,icmp,ip,interfaces,system_mib,sysORTable,snmp_mib > > -DwinExtDll > > registered debug token winExtDll, 1 > > init_winExtDLL: initialization of DLL

64-bit windows and winExtDLL

2012-03-19 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 03/19/12 16:16, Fulko Hew wrote: > C:\usr\bin>snmpd > -I-udp,udpTable,tcp,tcpTable,icmp,ip,interfaces,system_mib,sysORTable,snmp_mib > -DwinExtDll > registered debug token winExtDll, 1 > init_winExtDLL: initialization of DLL C:\Windows\System32\wow64mib.dll > failed. > init_winExtDLL: initializa