Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On fre, 2007-12-21 at 16:31 +1100, Ben Nizette wrote:
>> What ever the problem with sockets is, it's a different one, that
>> transport was built in. But not to worry.
>
> Yes, but it is interesting as it should work.
> If you add the flag -Dtdomain,netsnmp_unix_transpor
On fre, 2007-12-21 at 16:31 +1100, Ben Nizette wrote:
>
> In fact I had tried using TCP and it used to fail with the "no support
> for any checked transport domain" cruft. I just got the guy who
> compiled net-snmp for me to email across the configure line he used and
> for reasons best know to h
Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On fre, 2007-12-21 at 11:56 +1100, Ben Nizette wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I cannot correctly attached agentx subagents to my snmpd. If attempting
>> to use unix sockets, the attach just fails with "No Checked Transport
>> Domain" but that's fine, they attach just OK over udp.
On fre, 2007-12-21 at 11:56 +1100, Ben Nizette wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I cannot correctly attached agentx subagents to my snmpd. If attempting
> to use unix sockets, the attach just fails with "No Checked Transport
> Domain" but that's fine, they attach just OK over udp.
Eh, I suppose you are runnin
Hello,
I cannot correctly attached agentx subagents to my snmpd. If attempting
to use unix sockets, the attach just fails with "No Checked Transport
Domain" but that's fine, they attach just OK over udp.
Once attached over UDP, the ping and response packets head backwards and
forwards just nice
