On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 09:34:47AM -0400, Bill Fenner wrote:
> Thanks for the patch. In order to make sure that we don't lose track of
> it, could you please upload it to http://www.net-snmp.org/patches/ ?
Done; thanks.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
-
Hi Steinar,
Thanks for the patch. In order to make sure that we don't lose track of
it, could you please upload it to http://www.net-snmp.org/patches/ ?
Thanks,
Bill
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 01:41:12PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderso
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 01:41:12PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> The attached patch (in context diff, because unified diff became unusually
> unreadable!) first rewrites _gettable_do_it to be a bit less $#{$ everywhere
> (so that I could understand it myself :-) ), and then fixes so that it
Hi,
We've been using SNMP.pm to pull out various tables from our switches into
our home-grown network management system. However, there's one thing that's
been causing issues for us for a long time, and that's getting the LLDP
tables (lldpRemTable).
The basic issues is that the values, at least w
