Dave,
Thank you for your comments and for your efforts!
I know the exact problem, often chore, of working on software in
free time / lunch break, holidays, GHC, is one of my pets ;-)
If SMUX is really compatable with what we have then I'll be happy to
work bugs and submit patches... here's hopin
[Please keep all discussions on the mailing list, so
that others can both learn and offer advice. Thanks!]
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 11:25 +0100, Andrew Cheadle wrote:
> Dave,
>
> Thanks for the reply. Don't take this the wrong way ;-) Before I go down
> this route, I am thinking th
Hi,
I was wondering what the current state of support for SMUX
sub-agents in net-snmp 5.x is like. One of your pages lists it as
'?obsolete?'. I'vepreviously developed a SMUX subagent for an AIX snmpd
daemon and wondered if it was possible to perform a straight port and if
so if the software is st
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 22:05 +0100, Andrew Cheadle wrote:
> I was wondering what the current state of support for SMUX
> sub-agents in net-snmp 5.x is like.
Active support for SMUX is basically obsolete, in that
no-one is working on this code (and very few of us are
particularly familiar with it).
