Re: Disman Traps

2005-12-15 Thread Dave Shield
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 11:36 -0200, Wesley Naves de Faria wrote: > I added prErrorFlag == 0 but i got some problems. The snmp > always will send trap saying that process is up, But isn't that what you were asking for? One trap when the 'proc' entry detects a problem, and another trap when this prob

Re: Disman Traps

2005-12-15 Thread Wesley Naves de Faria
ROTECTED]> To: "Wesley Naves de Faria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 10:56 AM Subject: Re: Disman Traps > On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 10:28 -0200, Wesley Naves de Faria wrote: > >When I implementation a var proc in snmpd.conf ( proc httpd ), > &g

Re: Disman Traps

2005-12-15 Thread Dave Shield
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 10:28 -0200, Wesley Naves de Faria wrote: >When I implementation a var proc in snmpd.conf ( proc httpd ), > the snmpd send a trap if the process stop to run, but when the > process go back to run, the snmpd not send a trap. That's not strictly the realm of the DisMan Even

Disman Traps

2005-12-15 Thread Wesley Naves de Faria
Hello personal,   I am having a problem with Disman MIB, let´s go. When I implementation a var proc in snmpd.conf ( proc httpd ), the snmpd send a trap if the process stop to run, but when the proccess go back to run, the smpd not send a trap. Why I can change it ? I need receive trap when