On Thu, 31 May 2007 20:54:48 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> FR #592109:
DS> Traditionally, the Host Resources MIB implementation has
DS> reported NFS partitions as "fixed (local) disks", although there
DS> are options to report them correctly (or skip them altogether).
DS> * Should we consider repo
On 01/06/07, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > FR #744697:
> > * Is it worth suppressing this help output?
> > * Is it worth skipping these (irrelevant) flags in the option
> > processing?
>
> Can the presence of these options cause snmpdf et al. to malfunction?
I don't thin
Dave Shield wrote:
> FR #592109:
> Traditionally, the Host Resources MIB implementation has
> reported NFS partitions as "fixed (local) disks", although there
> are options to report them correctly (or skip them altogether).
> * Should we consider reporting them as NFS mounts by default
>
Those who monitor the S/F tracker or SVN commit mailing lists
may have noticed that I've been doing a mini blitz on the
Feature Requests tracker. There are a handful of entries that
perhaps warrent slightly wider discussion and input.
I'm therefore calling for comment on the following:
FR #5
