On 13 April 2010 06:02, Manjit wrote:
> Hi,
> How to configure a user for noauth using snmptrapd.conf.
$ man snmptrapd.conf
authUser TYPES [-s MODEL] USER [LEVEL [OID | -v VIEW ]]
authorises SNMPv3 notifications with the specified user to trig-
ger the t
Hi,
How to configure a user for noauth using snmptrapd.conf.
Regards,
Manjit
Wes Hardaker wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 06:20:44 -0700, Fatima Peter
>> said:
>>
>
> FP> So, for "noauth" user, we have to specify "disableAuthorization yes"
> FP> in the snmptrapd confgurati
> On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 06:20:44 -0700, Fatima Peter
> said:
FP> So, for "noauth" user, we have to specify "disableAuthorization yes"
FP> in the snmptrapd confguration.
You don't have to; instead you need to still configure a user in the
usmTable for snmptrapd and authorization that allow
What Manjit says seems to be correct.
It worked fine even when I specify the "-e ", it goes through engineID discovery first.
I also found that the engineID of "snmptrapd" changes at every
invocation as 2nd part of engineID seems to be the "start time" of
snmptrapd.
Thanks,
Fatima
On Mon, Apr 12
Hi All,
I believe if you send a snmp inform request with *noauth p*rotocol,
snmptrapd.conf need to be configure differently:
Follwing are working for me :
snmptrap -d -Ci -v 3 -l noauth -u informtest localhost 0
.1.3.6.1.6.3.1.1.5.4.0
Content of snmptrapd.conf :
disableAuthorization yes
Or you
On 9 April 2010 16:30, Fatima Peter wrote:
> If we remove the "engineID" from "snmptrap", I think the other end
> will reject due to engineID.
Not quite.
If you remove engineID from the "snmptrap -Ci" call, then the client
will first probe the trap receiver to determine the appropriate engine I
Dave,
If we remove the "engineID" from "snmptrap", I think the other end
will reject due to engineID. I an anycase, I tried it and here is what
I found. "snmptrapd" responds to the first message probably with the
engineID which "snmptrap" is not responding to correctly.
At the "snmptrap" end:
"
To receive inform the snmptrapd.conf need not to have -e engineID .
Please check
http://www.net-snmp.org/wiki/index.php/TUT:Configuring_snmptrapd_to_receive_SNMPv3_notifications#Configuring_a_SNMPv3_INFORM_User
If you remove -e from snmptrap command then also snmptrapd will receive
infrom because
On 9 April 2010 11:53, Fatima Peter wrote:
> snmptrap is sending inform message but is not getting inform response
> back. I enabled debug with -d and here is the exchange. If I entered
> just ".1.3.6.1.6.3.1.1.5.4.", I got an usage error: The t->local etc
> are output from snmptrap. It is sending
Thanks Dave for the response.
snmptrap is sending inform message but is not getting inform response
back. I enabled debug with -d and here is the exchange. If I entered
just ".1.3.6.1.6.3.1.1.5.4.", I got an usage error: The t->local etc
are output from snmptrap. It is sending INFORM(A6) but getti
On 9 April 2010 03:16, Fatima Peter wrote:
> I sent an inform message to the trap-server with the following command:
>
> $ sudo snmptrap
Why "sudo"?
Sending an SNMP request does not require special privileges,
so there seems no reason to run this as root.
> -Ci -v 3 -e 0x80001f888085b
- Forwarded message --
From: Fatima Peter
Date: Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: Help in getting inform work in v3
To: net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
I meant:
snmpd-trapsess -v 3 -t 1 -r 3 -e 0x80001f888085b94c4882d8bc4b -l
noauth -u inter -Ci 10.10.16.118:16
I meant:
snmpd-trapsess -v 3 -t 1 -r 3 -e 0x80001f888085b94c4882d8bc4b -l
noauth -u inter -Ci 10.10.16.118:162
or
snmpd-trapsess -v 3 -t 1 -r 3 -e 0x80001f888085b94c4882d8bc4b -l
noauth -u inter -n inter -Ci 10.10.16.118:162
Here is my snmptrapd.conf file:
"
# snmptrapd.conf
doNotRetainNotifica
Hello,
We are using net-snmp version 5.5. I have v1/v2c/v3 traps working
fine and inform also seems to work well in v2c. We have tested it with
snmptrapd as well as with a 3rd party vendor tool.
I seem to have problem getting inform work in v3. The informRequest
goes out to snmptrapd which i
14 matches
Mail list logo
