Re: Need a broken 64 bit example OID/u_long problem

2011-05-19 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Thu, 19 May 2011 14:57:57 +, "Rusk, Mark" said: RM> 1)When dlmod modules (x86_64) are built with net-snmp-5.5 (or earlier) RM> are loaded into a net-snmp-5.6.1 snmpd the typedefs for oid are in RM> conflict. You end up trying to register OIDS 1.0.3.0.6.0.1.0.4.0.*, RM> instead of 1.

Re: Need a broken 64 bit example OID/u_long problem

2011-05-19 Thread Niels Baggesen
Den 19-05-2011 16:33, Wes Hardaker skrev: > The reason I haven't gotten around to releasing 5.6.1.1 yet is that I > want to fix not only the typedef, but the problem the typedef is > causing. I can't find the bug. I've looked. I've run all sorts of > applications on 64 bit systems and don't see

RE: Need a broken 64 bit example OID/u_long problem

2011-05-19 Thread Rusk, Mark
et > Subject: Need a broken 64 bit example OID/u_long problem > > > The reason I haven't gotten around to releasing 5.6.1.1 yet is that I > want to fix not only the typedef, but the problem the typedef is > causing. I can't find the bug. I've looked. I've ru

Need a broken 64 bit example OID/u_long problem

2011-05-19 Thread Wes Hardaker
The reason I haven't gotten around to releasing 5.6.1.1 yet is that I want to fix not only the typedef, but the problem the typedef is causing. I can't find the bug. I've looked. I've run all sorts of applications on 64 bit systems and don't see the problem. So... Bart, or anyone else that ha